Daniel T. Cumberbatch

520 citations
9 papers · 345 indexed · h-index 9

Daniel T. Cumberbatch

9 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Cumberbatch
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 331
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 263
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 10
  • Instrumentation 2
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 18
Replace Anirban Biswas with:
Anirban Biswas India
Gilles Vertongen Germany
Andrzej Hryczuk Poland
K. M. Belotsky Russia
Yu N Eroshenko Russia
Junhai Kang United States
Fatemeh Elahi Iran
Ioannis Iatrakis Greece
Marco Hufnagel Germany
Purusottam Ghosh India
Daniel T. Cumberbatch relative to Anirban Biswas India Anirban Biswas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Anirban Biswas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Cumberbatch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Cumberbatch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Cumberbatch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Cumberbatch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Cumberbatch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Cumberbatch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Cumberbatch. The network helps show where Daniel T. Cumberbatch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Cumberbatch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Cumberbatch Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Cumberbatch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201213
2 201013
3 201043
4 201019
5 2008148
6 20089
7 200745
8 200742
9 200613

About Daniel T. Cumberbatch

Daniel T. Cumberbatch is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (9 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1 paper) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (331 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (263 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (10 citations), Instrumentation (2 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (18 citations). Daniel T. Cumberbatch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. West, Joseph Silk, John March-Russell, Dan Hooper, A. Palazzo, Anže Slosar, Glenn D. Starkman, Joyce Ann Guzik, Masahiro Kawasaki and Kazuhide Ichikawa. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of High Energy Physics, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026