Daniel Sloot

886 total citations
20 papers, 582 citations indexed

About

Daniel Sloot is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Sloot has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 582 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Daniel Sloot's work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (18 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (12 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (6 papers). Daniel Sloot is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Education and Sustainability (18 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (12 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (6 papers). Daniel Sloot collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Daniel Sloot's co-authors include Lise Jans, Linda Steg, Thomas Brückner, Fabian Scheller, Wolf Fïchtner, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Casper J. Albers, Maja Kutlaca, Russell McKenna and Andreas Flache and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Energy Policy and Ecological Economics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Sloot

20 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Sloot Germany 14 272 244 162 135 85 20 582
Stefanie Lena Hille Switzerland 15 317 1.2× 258 1.1× 156 1.0× 160 1.2× 210 2.5× 20 827
Ernst H. Noppers Netherlands 5 216 0.8× 137 0.6× 92 0.6× 175 1.3× 186 2.2× 5 517
Edina Vadovics Netherlands 9 206 0.8× 201 0.8× 72 0.4× 98 0.7× 68 0.8× 22 569
Jean Paul Ceron France 5 181 0.7× 212 0.9× 75 0.5× 40 0.3× 77 0.9× 8 542
Nives Della Valle Italy 14 146 0.5× 125 0.5× 189 1.2× 104 0.8× 44 0.5× 30 582
Ingo Kastner Germany 7 170 0.6× 98 0.4× 72 0.4× 94 0.7× 68 0.8× 12 397
Desley Vine Australia 10 121 0.4× 101 0.4× 143 0.9× 187 1.4× 26 0.3× 23 518
Grégoire Wallenborn Belgium 9 121 0.4× 129 0.5× 55 0.3× 72 0.5× 59 0.7× 36 435
Cecilia Jakobsson Bergstad Sweden 12 220 0.8× 180 0.7× 31 0.2× 73 0.5× 162 1.9× 18 897
Bernhard J. Kalkbrenner Germany 3 117 0.4× 238 1.0× 126 0.8× 150 1.1× 50 0.6× 4 440

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Sloot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Sloot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Sloot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Sloot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Sloot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Sloot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Sloot. The network helps show where Daniel Sloot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Sloot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Sloot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Sloot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Sloot. Daniel Sloot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Sloot, Daniel & Ann Bostrom. (2024). The role of framing in public support for direct air capture: A moral hazard survey experiment in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science. 116. 103694–103694. 2 indexed citations
3.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2023). The motivational drivers behind consumer preferences for regional electricity – Results of a choice experiment in Southern Germany. Energy Economics. 120. 106585–106585. 3 indexed citations
5.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Barriers to demand response in the commercial and industrial sectors – An empirical investigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 190. 114067–114067. 16 indexed citations
6.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Consumer preferences for the design of a demand response quota scheme – Results of a choice experiment in Germany. Energy Policy. 167. 113023–113023. 7 indexed citations
7.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2022). The Role of Community in Understanding Involvement in Community Energy Initiatives. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 775752–775752. 26 indexed citations
8.
Sloot, Daniel & Benjamin Scheibehenne. (2022). Understanding the financial incentive conundrum: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of financial incentive interventions in promoting energy conservation behavior. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 168. 112761–112761. 18 indexed citations
9.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2022). A Behavioral Science Perspective on Consumers’ Engagement With Demand Response Programs. 4(1). 10 indexed citations
10.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Willingness to pay for regional electricity generation – A question of green values and regional product beliefs?. Energy Economics. 110. 106003–106003. 16 indexed citations
11.
Scheller, Fabian, et al.. (2021). A meta-analysis of residential PV adoption: the important role of perceived benefits, intentions and antecedents in solar energy acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science. 84. 102339–102339. 144 indexed citations
12.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2021). The limited potential of regional electricity marketing – Results from two discrete choice experiments in Germany. Energy Economics. 100. 105351–105351. 13 indexed citations
13.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Explaining and promoting participation in demand response programs: The role of rational and moral motivations among German energy consumers. Energy Research & Social Science. 84. 102431–102431. 32 indexed citations
14.
Sloot, Daniel, Lise Jans, & Linda Steg. (2021). Is an Appeal Enough? The Limited Impact of Financial, Environmental, and Communal Appeals in Promoting Involvement in Community Environmental Initiatives. Sustainability. 13(3). 1085–1085. 14 indexed citations
15.
Molinario, Erica, Paola Perucchini, Agathe Colléony, et al.. (2020). From childhood nature experiences to adult pro-environmental behaviors: An explanatory model of sustainable food consumption. Environmental Education Research. 26(8). 1137–1163. 40 indexed citations
16.
Scheller, Fabian, et al.. (2020). Exploring the Role of Stakeholder Dynamics in Residential Photovoltaic Adoption Decisions: A Synthesis of the Literature. Energies. 13(23). 6283–6283. 25 indexed citations
17.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Using a Gaussian Graphical Model to Explore Relationships Between Items and Variables in Environmental Psychology Research. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1050–1050. 49 indexed citations
18.
Sloot, Daniel, Lise Jans, & Linda Steg. (2019). In it for the money, the environment, or the community? Motives for being involved in community energy initiatives. Global Environmental Change. 57. 101936–101936. 68 indexed citations
19.
Sloot, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Recycling Alone or Protesting Together? Values as a Basis for Pro-environmental Social Change Actions. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1229–1229. 23 indexed citations
20.
Sloot, Daniel, Lise Jans, & Linda Steg. (2018). Can community energy initiatives motivate sustainable energy behaviours? The role of initiative involvement and personal pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 57. 99–106. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026