Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Shaviro
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Shaviro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Shaviro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Shaviro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Shaviro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Shaviro. The network helps show where Daniel Shaviro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Shaviro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Shaviro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Shaviro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Shaviro. Daniel Shaviro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., et al.. (2019). The Games They Will Play: Tax Games, Roadblocks, and Glitches under the 2017 Tax Legislation. Minnesota law review. 103(3). 1439.10 indexed citations
3.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2018). Evaluating the New US Pass-Through Rules. 49–67.2 indexed citations
4.
Altshuler, Rosanne, et al.. (2018). The Future of the New International Tax Regime. eYLS (Yale Law School). 24(2).
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., et al.. (2017). The Games They Will Play: An Update on the Conference Committee Tax Bill. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2015). The Two Faces of the Single Tax Principle. Brooklyn journal of international law. 41(3). 12.
8.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2013). The Forgotten Henry Simons. Florida State University law review. 41(1). 1.3 indexed citations
9.
Auerbach, Alan J. & Daniel Shaviro. (2008). Institutional foundations of public finance : economic and legal perspectives. eYLS (Yale Law School).25 indexed citations
10.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2007). Beyond the Pro-Consumption Tax Consensus. Stanford Law Review. 60(3). 745.4 indexed citations
11.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2004). Reckless Disregard: The Bush Administration's Policy of Cutting Taxes in the Face of an Enormous Fiscal Gap. Boston College law review. 45(5). 1285.2 indexed citations
12.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2002). The Growing U.S. Fiscal Gap. World Economy. 3(4). 1–8.3 indexed citations
13.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2002). Money on the Table?: Responding to Cross-Border Tax Arbitrage. Chicago journal of international law. 3(2). 6.2 indexed citations
14.
Weisbach, David A. & Daniel Shaviro. (2002). The Fifth Circuit Gets It Wrong in Compaq v. Commissioner. eYLS (Yale Law School). 94. 511.65 indexed citations
15.
Shaviro, Daniel. (2001). Making Sense of Social Security Reform. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
16.
Shaviro, Daniel. (1995). Budget Deficits and the Intergenerational Distribution of Lifetime Consumption.274 indexed citations
17.
Shaviro, Daniel. (1993). Federalism in Taxation: The Case for Greater Uniformity. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
Koehler, Jonathan J. & Daniel Shaviro. (1990). Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 75(2). 246–278.42 indexed citations
20.
Shaviro, Daniel. (1990). The Supreme Court's Bifurcated Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause. Hastings constitutional law quarterly. 17(2). 383.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.