Daniel Schmitter

737 citations
23 papers · 539 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schmitter

23 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Daniel Schmitter
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 65
  • Biophysics 55
  • Aging 13
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 21
  • Developmental Neuroscience 23
Replace Matthijs van Eede with:
Matthijs van Eede Canada
J. Kaufhold United States
G. Tavares Brazil
Frank Hertel Luxembourg
Ayumu Matani Japan
Marcello DiStasio United States
Dmitry D. Postnov Denmark
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos France
Daniel J. Tward United States
Henrik Skibbe Japan
Daniel Schmitter relative to Matthijs van Eede Canada Matthijs van Eede's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Matthijs van Eede · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schmitter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schmitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schmitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schmitter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schmitter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schmitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schmitter. The network helps show where Daniel Schmitter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schmitter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schmitter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schmitter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20205
3 20172
4 20174
5 201716
6 20166
7 201617
8 20162
9 201520
10 20156
11 20152
12 201514
13 20152
14 20156
15 2014154
16 201411
17 201450
18 201312
19 201381
20 2012117

About Daniel Schmitter

Daniel Schmitter is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics, Biophysics and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (11 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers) and Image and Object Detection Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (65 citations), Biophysics (55 citations), Aging (13 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (21 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations). Daniel Schmitter has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Unser, Daniel Sage, Ricard Delgado-Gonzalo, Virginie Uhlmann, Marlen Knobloch, Marta Roccio, Matthias P. Lütolf, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Alessandro Daducci and Alexis Roche. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Signal Processing Letters, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, NeuroImage Clinical, BioScience and Computational Visual Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026