Daniel S. Newman

2.1k total citations
81 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Daniel S. Newman is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel S. Newman has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 29 papers in Social Psychology and 24 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel S. Newman's work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (32 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (27 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (10 papers). Daniel S. Newman is often cited by papers focused on Educational and Psychological Assessments (32 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (27 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (10 papers). Daniel S. Newman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Daniel S. Newman's co-authors include J. Rosenberg, Edward J. Kasarskis, Robert Sufit, Benjamin Rix Brooks, Deborah Gelinas, Hiroshi Mitsumoto, Mark B. Bromberg, Edward Anthony Oppenheimer, Gian Domenico Borasio and Walter G. Bradley and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Stroke and IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

In The Last Decade

Daniel S. Newman

73 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel S. Newman United States 17 572 359 306 245 230 81 1.3k
Sharon Guger Canada 18 104 0.2× 231 0.6× 142 0.5× 79 0.3× 83 0.4× 34 931
Matthew King Canada 20 185 0.3× 89 0.2× 136 0.4× 99 0.4× 84 0.4× 42 1.5k
Kristina K. Hardy United States 34 147 0.3× 574 1.6× 950 3.1× 180 0.7× 63 0.3× 101 3.2k
Sarah C. Carpentieri United States 13 67 0.1× 203 0.6× 350 1.1× 50 0.2× 88 0.4× 17 933
Monica Bucci United States 17 135 0.2× 84 0.2× 844 2.8× 23 0.1× 110 0.5× 29 2.0k
Ineke Pit-Ten Cate Luxembourg 20 77 0.1× 65 0.2× 276 0.9× 131 0.5× 142 0.6× 48 1.1k
Amanda Kirby United Kingdom 25 595 1.0× 61 0.2× 291 1.0× 1.6k 6.7× 61 0.3× 71 3.1k
Jan B. M. Kuks Netherlands 28 1.0k 1.8× 121 0.3× 53 0.2× 34 0.1× 39 0.2× 72 2.4k
B. Christine United States 28 144 0.3× 212 0.6× 2.1k 6.7× 37 0.2× 536 2.3× 62 3.0k
Angela Glover Blackwell United States 7 79 0.1× 388 1.1× 70 0.2× 143 0.6× 18 0.1× 14 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Newman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Newman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Newman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Newman. The network helps show where Daniel S. Newman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel S. Newman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel S. Newman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel S. Newman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel S. Newman. Daniel S. Newman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Morrison, Julie Q., et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of Prompts and Performance Feedback on Teacher’s Use of Behavior Specific Praise and Behavioral Outcomes for Students on the Autism Spectrum. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 35(4). 432–456.
2.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2024). Consultation Training to Develop Change Agents: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 34(4). 319–324.
3.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2023). A qualitative content analysis of novice consultants' responses to a consultee's request for assistance. Psychology in the Schools. 60(8). 2657–2673. 1 indexed citations
4.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2023). Publication and characteristics of qualitative research in School Psychology journals between 2006 and 2021.. School Psychology. 38(5). 330–336. 9 indexed citations
5.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2022). Deliberate practice of consultation communication skills: A randomized controlled trial.. School Psychology. 37(3). 225–235. 8 indexed citations
7.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2020). Supervision of School Psychology Practicum Experiences: Recommendations for Supervisors and Supervisees.. Communique. 48(6).
8.
Newman, Daniel S. & Colette L. Ingraham. (2020). Cross-university dialogues to support multicultural school consultation training. Journal of School Psychology. 81. 11–27. 12 indexed citations
9.
Morrison, Julie Q., Daniel S. Newman, & Amy S. Gaumer Erickson. (2020). Process Evaluation of Literacy Practices within a Multi-Tiered System of Supports Framework. Journal of Applied School Psychology. 37(2). 140–164. 5 indexed citations
10.
Arcila-Londono, Ximena, David Walk, Scott Vota, et al.. (2019). General Characteristics of edaravone Use in the Natural History of ALS and Other Motor Neuron Disorders Consortium Dataset (NeuroBANK ) (S5.006). Neurology. 92(15_supplement). 1 indexed citations
11.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2019). Structured peer group supervision of school consultation:A case study. The Clinical Supervisor. 38(1). 135–157. 9 indexed citations
12.
Newman, Daniel S., Dennis J. Simon, & Mark E. Swerdlik. (2018). What we know and do not know about supervision in school psychology: A systematic mapping and review of the literature between 2000 and 2017. Psychology in the Schools. 56(3). 306–334. 14 indexed citations
13.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2016). A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Consultation Process Research: What We Know and Where to Go. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 27(1). 13–51. 20 indexed citations
14.
Barrett, Courtenay A., Cynthia E. Hazel, & Daniel S. Newman. (2016). Training confident school-based consultants: The role of course content, process, and supervision.. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. 11(1). 41–48. 11 indexed citations
15.
Griffith, Brent, et al.. (2015). Idiopathic spinal cord herniation: an imaging diagnosis with a significant delay. The Spine Journal. 15(9). 1943–1948. 16 indexed citations
16.
Newman, Daniel S., Colette L. Ingraham, & David Shriberg. (2014). Consultee-Centered Consultation in Contemporary Schools.. Communique. 42(6). 14–17. 5 indexed citations
17.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2014). The Consulting Role in a Response-to-Intervention Context: An Exploratory Study of Instructional Consultation. Journal of Applied School Psychology. 30(3). 278–304. 8 indexed citations
18.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (2013). Structured Peer Group Supervision for Novice Consultants: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Potential. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 23(3). 200–216. 18 indexed citations
19.
Lee, Jon, et al.. (2013). Optimizing the Assignment of Students to Classes in an Elementary School. INFORMS Transactions on Education. 14(1). 39–44. 8 indexed citations
20.
Newman, Daniel S., et al.. (1995). Thoracic radicular symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 129. 38–41. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026