Daniel S. Keller

709 citations
31 papers · 493 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Keller

28 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 92
  • Epidemiology 193
  • General Health Professions 136
Replace Michael Czuchry with:
Michael Czuchry United States
Victoria A. Besalel United States
Linda Grossman United States
Sonja Bröning Germany
Antover P. Tuliao United States
Anke Snoek Netherlands
Sterling T. Shumway United States
Cynthia R. Kalodner United States
Jeffrey A. Bernat United States
Martin Hildebrand Netherlands
Daniel S. Keller relative to Michael Czuchry United States Michael Czuchry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Michael Czuchry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Keller. The network helps show where Daniel S. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Keller Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001140
2 199175
3 200044
4 196037
5 199529
6 200218
7 200315
8 199714
9 199913
10 201713
11 199312
12 199410
13 19599
14 20209
15 19978
16 19947
17 19556
18 19955
19 19985
20 19984

About Daniel S. Keller

Daniel S. Keller is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (6 papers), Multilevel Inverters and Converters (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations), Epidemiology (193 citations) and General Health Professions (136 citations). Daniel S. Keller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Carroll, Helen Dermatis, Barbara S. McCrady, Jon Morgenstern, Thomas J. H. Morgan, Marc Galanter, B Rounsaville, Julio Caro Baroja, Susan Egelko and Bruce J. Rounsaville. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Substance Abuse, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Journal of Addictive Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact