Daniel S. Connor

457 total citations
10 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

Daniel S. Connor is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel S. Connor has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Organic Chemistry, 3 papers in Spectroscopy and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Daniel S. Connor's work include Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (2 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (2 papers). Daniel S. Connor is often cited by papers focused on Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (2 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (2 papers). Daniel S. Connor collaborates with scholars based in United States and India. Daniel S. Connor's co-authors include Kenneth B. Wiberg, Gary M. Lampman, H. L. Ritz, David W. Thomas, R. M. Parkhurst, J. F. Bunnett, David Cooper, Pamela J. Björkman, Thomas J. Emge and Mark E. Jason and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Tetrahedron.

In The Last Decade

Daniel S. Connor

10 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel S. Connor United States	7	246	82	68	37	34	10	380
André Thévand France	14	173 0.7×	262 3.2×	43 0.6×	65 1.8×	8 0.2×	34	508
Kaipenchery A. Kumar United States	11	214 0.9×	146 1.8×	16 0.2×	59 1.6×	7 0.2×	31	351
Heinz F. Koch United States	12	212 0.9×	52 0.6×	77 1.1×	40 1.1×	2 0.1×	31	359
Stanley J. Brois United States	14	465 1.9×	125 1.5×	37 0.5×	161 4.4×	4 0.1×	21	617
Gregory J. Wolber United States	11	309 1.3×	55 0.7×	101 1.5×	53 1.4×	1 0.0×	14	384
P. VON R. SCHLEYER Germany	9	257 1.0×	67 0.8×	58 0.9×	38 1.0×		18	373
Max Muir United States	7	187 0.8×	73 0.9×	268 3.9×	33 0.9×	2 0.1×	12	452
J.‐L. RIPOLL France	13	263 1.1×	69 0.8×	91 1.3×	24 0.6×		27	379
P. Ashkenazi Israel	11	229 0.9×	63 0.8×	40 0.6×	35 0.9×	1 0.0×	52	353
Koji Aigami Japan	11	301 1.2×	87 1.1×	57 0.8×	92 2.5×	1 0.0×	40	462

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Connor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Connor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Connor. The network helps show where Daniel S. Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel S. Connor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel S. Connor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel S. Connor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel S. Connor. Daniel S. Connor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Cooper, David, et al.. (2016). Comparative analysis of anti-polyglutamine Fab crystals grown on Earth and in microgravity. Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications. 72(10). 762–771. 4 indexed citations

2.

Emge, Thomas J., et al.. (1993). Structure of disodium monocalcium tartrate monosuccinate trihydrate, Na₂(CaTMS).3H₂O. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science. 49(4). 675–679. 1 indexed citations

3.

Bunnett, J. F., et al.. (1979). Action of potassium amide in ammonia on some benzophenone derivatives. Evidence that o-bromophenyl anions partition between aryne formation and protonation to aryl bromides. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 44(23). 4197–4199. 7 indexed citations

4.

Connor, Daniel S., et al.. (1976). Determination of 1‐alkene‐1,3‐sultones in alkylethoxy sulfates. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 53(5). 182–185. 4 indexed citations

5.

Connor, Daniel S., et al.. (1975). Identification of Certain Sultones as the Sensitizers in an Alkyl Ethoxy Sulfate. Fette Seifen Anstrichmittel. 77(1). 25–29. 23 indexed citations

6.

Ritz, H. L., et al.. (1975). Contact sensitization of guinea‐pigs with unsaturated and halogenated sultones. Contact Dermatitis. 1(6). 349–358. 28 indexed citations

7.

Connor, Daniel S., et al.. (1967). Ring closures via the Wurtz reaction a convenient synthesis of cyclobutane. Tetrahedron Letters. 8(49). 4925–4929. 14 indexed citations

8.

Wiberg, Kenneth B. & Daniel S. Connor. (1966). Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane¹. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 88(19). 4437–4441. 70 indexed citations

9.

Wiberg, Kenneth B., et al.. (1965). Bicyclo[1.1.0]butane. Tetrahedron. 21(10). 2749–2769. 192 indexed citations

10.

Wiberg, Kenneth B., Daniel S. Connor, & Gary M. Lampman. (1964). The reaction of 3-bromocyclobutane-1-methyl bromide with sodium : bicyclo[1. 1. 1]pentane. Tetrahedron Letters. 5(10). 531–534. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact