Daniel Ringo

573 citations
34 papers · 280 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Accounting top 5%
    • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Finance top 5%
    • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency

Papers in

Daniel Ringo

33 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Daniel Ringo
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Accounting 149
  • Finance 117
  • Economics and Econometrics 211
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15
  • Demography 16
Replace Scott Fulford with:
Scott Fulford United States
Ankit Kalda United States
Andrew Paciorek United States
Quanlin Gu China
Steven Laufer United States
Alex Kaufman United States
Samuel Kruger United States
Chong Huang United States
Michael Simkovic United States
Kevin E. Rogers United States
Daniel Ringo relative to Scott Fulford United States Scott Fulford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Scott Fulford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ringo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ringo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ringo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ringo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ringo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ringo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ringo. The network helps show where Daniel Ringo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ringo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ringo Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ringo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201953
2 202033
3 202120
4 201720
5 201616
6 201616
7 202215
8 201713
9 202110
10 202210
11 20168
12 20236
13 20175
14 20195
15 20155
16 20175
17 20204
18 20173
19 20223
20 20223

About Daniel Ringo

Daniel Ringo is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Finance, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing Market and Economics (28 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (20 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (1 paper) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (149 citations), Finance (117 citations), Economics and Econometrics (211 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (15 citations) and Demography (16 citations). Daniel Ringo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Neil Bhutta, Kamila Sommer, Shane M. Sherlund, Elliot Anenberg, Aurel Hizmo and Steven Laufer. Their work appears in journals such as Real Estate Economics, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Journal of money credit and banking, American Economic Journal Macroeconomics and The Journal of Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact