Daniel Remias

2.5k citations
48 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Remias

44 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daniel Remias
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Ecology 962
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 550
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 636
  • Oceanography 397
  • Atmospheric Science 415
Replace Willem H. van de Poll with:
Willem H. van de Poll Netherlands
Ronald W. Hoham United States
Peter Boelen Netherlands
Thomas Leya Germany
Lenka Procházková Czechia
M. N. Clayton Australia
Suzanne Roy Canada
Curt M. Pueschel United States
H. A. Matlick United States
Evgeniy Gusev Russia
Daniel Remias relative to Willem H. van de Poll Netherlands Willem H. van de Poll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Willem H. van de Poll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Remias

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Remias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Remias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Remias more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Remias

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Remias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Remias. The network helps show where Daniel Remias may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Remias, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Remias Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Remias links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005165
2 2019116
3 2011113
4 2017107
5 200998
6 201084
7 201176
8 200966
9 201264
10 202058
11 201357
12 201555
13 201353
14 201650
15 201843
16 201042
17 200936
18 201832
19 202132
20 200732

About Daniel Remias

Daniel Remias is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Molecular Biology and Oceanography, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polar Research and Ecology (28 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (27 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (21 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (12 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (10 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (9 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (5 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (962 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (550 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (636 citations), Oceanography (397 citations) and Atmospheric Science (415 citations). Daniel Remias has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cornelius Lütz, Andreas Holzinger, Thomas Leya, Lenka Procházková, Ronald W. Hoham, Ursula Lütz‐Meindl, Linda Nedbalová, Siegfried Aigner, Ulf Karsten and Tomáš Řezanka. Their work appears in journals such as FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Journal of Phycology, Phycologia, Scientific Reports and Polar Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact