Daniel Oesterwind

1.6k total citations
46 papers, 518 citations indexed

About

Daniel Oesterwind is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Oesterwind has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 518 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 24 papers in Ecology and 20 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Daniel Oesterwind's work include Marine and fisheries research (32 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (20 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (16 papers). Daniel Oesterwind is often cited by papers focused on Marine and fisheries research (32 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (20 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (16 papers). Daniel Oesterwind collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Spain. Daniel Oesterwind's co-authors include Anastasija Zaiko, Paul Kotterba, Uwe Piatkowski, Vladimir Laptikhovsky, Wolfgang Probst, Christian von Dorrien, Heinz Brendelberger, Cornelius Hammer, Graham J. Pierce and Matthias Schaber and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Limnology and Oceanography and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Oesterwind

44 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Oesterwind Germany 13 315 265 170 164 75 46 518
Lisa C. Hendrickson United States 12 374 1.2× 279 1.1× 208 1.2× 117 0.7× 57 0.8× 24 520
Miguel Cabanellas‐Reboredo Spain 18 457 1.5× 457 1.7× 170 1.0× 146 0.9× 194 2.6× 45 725
Manuela Azevedo Portugal 18 538 1.7× 322 1.2× 69 0.4× 252 1.5× 69 0.9× 38 699
H.M.J. van Overzee Netherlands 9 229 0.7× 219 0.8× 53 0.3× 172 1.0× 128 1.7× 24 495
Nedo Vrgoč Croatia 14 428 1.4× 269 1.0× 76 0.4× 184 1.1× 83 1.1× 43 570
M. Begoña Santos Portugal 10 434 1.4× 389 1.5× 78 0.5× 291 1.8× 81 1.1× 14 662
Gwenaël Cadiou Australia 10 489 1.6× 565 2.1× 37 0.2× 199 1.2× 80 1.1× 14 699
José Anchieta C. C. Nunes Brazil 17 393 1.2× 521 2.0× 98 0.6× 268 1.6× 118 1.6× 52 714
AJ Hobday Australia 12 317 1.0× 322 1.2× 62 0.4× 94 0.6× 169 2.3× 28 522
Eneko Aspillaga Spain 15 242 0.8× 430 1.6× 42 0.2× 214 1.3× 188 2.5× 34 603

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Oesterwind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Oesterwind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Oesterwind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Oesterwind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Oesterwind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Oesterwind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Oesterwind. The network helps show where Daniel Oesterwind may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Oesterwind

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Oesterwind. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Oesterwind based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Oesterwind. Daniel Oesterwind is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Fiorentino, Dario, et al.. (2025). Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: ecological plausibility and performance metrics. Ecological Modelling. 508. 111207–111207. 1 indexed citations
3.
Oesterwind, Daniel, Valerio Bartolino, Jane W. Behrens, et al.. (2025). Disentangling the potential effects of four non-indigenous species on commercially and recreationally used fish stocks in the Baltic Sea—a review. Biological Invasions. 27(2). 1 indexed citations
4.
Oesterwind, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Fatty acid analyses reveal differences in feeding ecology of North Sea squids that overlap in time and space. Food Webs. 40. e00355–e00355. 1 indexed citations
5.
Silva, Ângela, et al.. (2024). Fisheries independent surveys in a new era of offshore wind energy development. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 82(3). 3 indexed citations
6.
Power, Anne, Finlay Burns, Pierluigi Carbonara, et al.. (2024). Stock discrimination of two European squids (Illex coindetii, Loligo forbesii) by statolith shape analysis. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 31(3).
7.
Möllmann, Christian, et al.. (2024). Identifying fit-for purpose methods for monitoring fish communities. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10. 6 indexed citations
9.
Vega, Camille de la, et al.. (2023). Trophic redundancy in benthic fish food webs increases with scarcity of prey items, in the Southern Baltic Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10. 5 indexed citations
10.
Oesterwind, Daniel & Uwe Piatkowski. (2023). Stomach content analysis of North Sea cephalopods: often-overlooked predators with direct impact on commercially used fish species?. Marine Biology. 170(8). 4 indexed citations
11.
Stelzenmüller, Vanessa, et al.. (2023). The rapid expansion of offshore wind farms challenges the reliability of ICES-coordinated fish surveys—insights from the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 82(3). 9 indexed citations
12.
Power, Anne, Graham J. Pierce, Ana Moreno, et al.. (2023). Cephalopods, a gap in the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive and their future integration. Marine Biology. 170(3). 7 indexed citations
13.
Oesterwind, Daniel, Anne F. Sell, Ismael Núñez‐Riboni, et al.. (2022). Climate change-related changes in cephalopod biodiversity on the North East Atlantic Shelf. Biodiversity and Conservation. 31(5-6). 1491–1518. 29 indexed citations
14.
Laptikhovsky, Vladimir, Gavan M. Cooke, Daniel Oesterwind, et al.. (2021). Identification of benthic egg masses and spawning grounds in commercial squid in the English Channel and Celtic Sea: Loligo vulgaris vs L. forbesii. Fisheries Research. 241. 106004–106004. 8 indexed citations
15.
Oesterwind, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Ommastrephid squid spawning in the North Sea: oceanography, climate change and species range expansion. Scientia Marina. 85(1). 49–56. 4 indexed citations
16.
Behrens, Jane W., Redik Eschbaum, Ann‐Britt Florin, et al.. (2021). Seasonal depth distribution and thermal experience of the non-indigenous round goby Neogobius melanostomus in the Baltic Sea: implications to key trophic relations. Biological Invasions. 24(2). 527–541. 15 indexed citations
17.
Dorrien, Christian von, et al.. (2021). Marine Protected Areas: At the Crossroads of Nature Conservation and Fisheries Management. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8. 29 indexed citations
18.
Oesterwind, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Drivers and pressures – Untangling the terms commonly used in marine science and policy. Journal of Environmental Management. 181. 8–15. 73 indexed citations
19.
Winkler, Helmut G. F., Paul Kotterba, & Daniel Oesterwind. (2015). Round Goby: A story of invasion success in the Baltic. 1 indexed citations
20.
Borges, Maria de Fátima, Heino O. Fock, Simon P. R. Greenstreet, et al.. (2013). Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO) 1–8 May 2013 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026