Daniel N. Marcus

817 total citations
8 papers, 625 citations indexed

About

Daniel N. Marcus is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel N. Marcus has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 625 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Daniel N. Marcus's work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (3 papers). Daniel N. Marcus is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (3 papers). Daniel N. Marcus collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Daniel N. Marcus's co-authors include Gregory J. Dick, Ameet Pinto, Lutgarde Raskin, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Q. Melina Bautista-de los Santos, David R. Cole, Richard Wolfe, Bopaiah A. Biddanda, Michael J. Wilkins and Rebecca A. Daly and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology and Nature Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel N. Marcus

8 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel N. Marcus United States 8 306 216 149 131 117 8 625
Sophie Guasco France 18 454 1.5× 235 1.1× 202 1.4× 190 1.5× 57 0.5× 44 865
Cameron M. Callbeck Switzerland 15 420 1.4× 279 1.3× 244 1.6× 155 1.2× 74 0.6× 23 928
Elias Broman Sweden 19 495 1.6× 212 1.0× 270 1.8× 144 1.1× 95 0.8× 48 902
Nagissa Mahmoudi United States 15 436 1.4× 340 1.6× 231 1.6× 119 0.9× 144 1.2× 28 913
Tina Lösekann-Behrens Germany 10 189 0.6× 141 0.7× 269 1.8× 77 0.6× 98 0.8× 10 576
Marc Llirós Spain 16 402 1.3× 172 0.8× 206 1.4× 181 1.4× 49 0.4× 27 728
Bettina Anneser Germany 5 257 0.8× 340 1.6× 107 0.7× 79 0.6× 117 1.0× 5 614
Philipp F. Hach Germany 14 503 1.6× 182 0.8× 310 2.1× 174 1.3× 37 0.3× 14 779
Mary‐Cathrine Leewis United States 13 310 1.0× 139 0.6× 172 1.2× 126 1.0× 47 0.4× 21 606
Melitza Crespo‐Medina United States 10 267 0.9× 147 0.7× 264 1.8× 125 1.0× 53 0.5× 16 561

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel N. Marcus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel N. Marcus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel N. Marcus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel N. Marcus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel N. Marcus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel N. Marcus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel N. Marcus. The network helps show where Daniel N. Marcus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel N. Marcus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel N. Marcus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel N. Marcus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel N. Marcus. Daniel N. Marcus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Borton, Mikayla, Rebecca A. Daly, David Hoyt, et al.. (2018). Comparative genomics and physiology of the genus Methanohalophilus , a prevalent methanogen in hydraulically fractured shale. Environmental Microbiology. 20(12). 4596–4611. 24 indexed citations
2.
Sharrar, Allison, Beverly E. Flood, Jake V. Bailey, et al.. (2017). Novel Large Sulfur Bacteria in the Metagenomes of Groundwater-Fed Chemosynthetic Microbial Mats in the Lake Huron Basin. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8. 791–791. 20 indexed citations
3.
Daly, Rebecca A., Mikayla Borton, Michael J. Wilkins, et al.. (2016). Microbial metabolisms in a 2.5-km-deep ecosystem created by hydraulic fracturing in shales. Nature Microbiology. 1(10). 16146–16146. 194 indexed citations
4.
Marcus, Daniel N., Ameet Pinto, Karthik Anantharaman, et al.. (2016). Diverse manganese(II)‐oxidizing bacteria are prevalent in drinking water systems. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 9(2). 120–128. 59 indexed citations
5.
Kinsman‐Costello, Lauren, Cody S. Sheik, Nathan D. Sheldon, et al.. (2016). Groundwater shapes sediment biogeochemistry and microbial diversity in a submerged Great Lake sinkhole. Geobiology. 15(2). 225–239. 28 indexed citations
6.
Voorhies, Alexander A., Sarah D. Eisenlord, Daniel N. Marcus, et al.. (2015). Ecological and genetic interactions between cyanobacteria and viruses in a low‐oxygen mat community inferred through metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Environmental Microbiology. 18(2). 358–371. 35 indexed citations
7.
Pinto, Ameet, Daniel N. Marcus, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, et al.. (2015). Metagenomic Evidence for the Presence of Comammox Nitrospira -Like Bacteria in a Drinking Water System. mSphere. 1(1). 208 indexed citations
8.
Voorhies, Alexander A., Bopaiah A. Biddanda, Sunit Jain, et al.. (2012). Cyanobacterial life at low O2: community genomics and function reveal metabolic versatility and extremely low diversity in a Great Lakes sinkhole mat. Geobiology. 10(3). 250–267. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026