Daniel Münch

891 citations
23 papers · 650 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Insect and Pesticide Research
    • Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Aging top 10%
    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Papers in

Daniel Münch

22 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Daniel Münch
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Insect Science 432
  • Aging 33
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 345
  • Genetics 424
  • Physiology 31
Replace Kanako Mitsumasu with:
Kanako Mitsumasu Japan
Adam Bajgar Czechia
Pierre Fouillet France
Francine Goltzené France
Ellen Thomsen United Kingdom
Harriet G. McWatters United Kingdom
N. A. Chentsova Russia
Edwin P. Marks United States
Е. К. Карпова Russia
Honoo Satake Japan
Daniel Münch relative to Kanako Mitsumasu Japan Kanako Mitsumasu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Kanako Mitsumasu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Münch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Münch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Münch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Münch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Münch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Münch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Münch. The network helps show where Daniel Münch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Münch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Münch Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Münch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010110
2 2008107
3 2013105
4 201354
5 201946
6 201537
7 201831
8 202126
9 201725
10 202217
11 201614
12 201313
13 202113
14 201812
15 201911
16 20218
17 20157
18 20226
19 20105
20 20221

About Daniel Münch

Daniel Münch is a scholar working on Genetics, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (3 papers), Freezing and Crystallization Processes (2 papers) and Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (432 citations), Aging (33 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (345 citations), Genetics (424 citations) and Physiology (31 citations). Daniel Münch has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Gro V. Amdam, Florian Wolschin, Heli Salmela, Anne Baumann, Heli Havukainen, Michelle Krogsgaard, Øyvind Halskau, Zhong Shi, Ørjan G. Martinsen and Bjørg Egelandsdal. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Meat Science, Apidologie and Experimental Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact