Daniel M. Griffith

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Horticulture 55
  • Forestry 145
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 400
  • Ecological Modeling 112
  • Global and Planetary Change 489
Replace Iris Motzke with:
Iris Motzke Germany
Neptalı́ Ramı́rez-Marcial Mexico
René Boot Netherlands
Gerald Eilu Uganda
Mark Wishnie United States
Judy Loo Italy
Malvika Onial United Kingdom
Susana Ochoa‐Gaona Mexico
Badrul Azhar Malaysia
Hans Juergen Boehmer Germany
Daniel M. Griffith relative to Iris Motzke Germany Iris Motzke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Iris Motzke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Griffith. The network helps show where Daniel M. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008383
2 2008351
3 200382
4 201161
5 201237
6 200036
7 202329
8 201627
9 202221
10 201521
11 201121
12 201714
13 202013
14
Forest statistics for Ohio, 1991. Forest Service resource bulletin (Final)
199310
15 20157
16 20165
17 20214
18
Forest statistics for Maine, 1995. Forest Service resource bulletin
19964
19
Tecnología agrícola y conservación biológica en el Petén, Guatemala
20043
20 20243

About Daniel M. Griffith

Daniel M. Griffith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers) and Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (55 citations), Forestry (145 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (400 citations), Ecological Modeling (112 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (489 citations). Daniel M. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in Ecuador, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce G. Ferguson, Helda Morales, Ronald Nigh, Célia A. Harvey, Miguel Martı́nez-Ramos, Lorena Soto‐Pinto, Oliver Komar, Michiel van Breugel, Robin L. Chazdon and Stacy M. Philpott. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, The Science of The Total Environment, Forest Ecology and Management, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Land Degradation and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact