Daniel M. Griffith

2.6k total citations
23 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Daniel M. Griffith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel M. Griffith has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Daniel M. Griffith's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (4 papers). Daniel M. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (4 papers). Daniel M. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in Ecuador, Spain and United States. Daniel M. Griffith's co-authors include Bruce G. Ferguson, Helda Morales, Ronald Nigh, Lorena Soto‐Pinto, Miguel Martínez‐Ramos, Robin L. Chazdon, Oliver Komar, Michiel van Breugel, Célia A. Harvey and Stacy M. Philpott and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel M. Griffith

21 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel M. Griffith Ecuador 13 488 398 340 215 160 23 1.1k
Mark Wishnie United States 13 451 0.9× 420 1.1× 269 0.8× 155 0.7× 141 0.9× 17 1.1k
Susana Ochoa‐Gaona Mexico 17 500 1.0× 349 0.9× 322 0.9× 167 0.8× 128 0.8× 61 1.1k
Satoru Okubo Japan 18 534 1.1× 374 0.9× 263 0.8× 210 1.0× 261 1.6× 45 1.1k
Malvika Onial United Kingdom 5 659 1.4× 287 0.7× 417 1.2× 180 0.8× 163 1.0× 5 1.2k
Eliane Ceccon Mexico 18 438 0.9× 440 1.1× 207 0.6× 146 0.7× 187 1.2× 65 1.0k
Iris Motzke Germany 9 590 1.2× 309 0.8× 460 1.4× 451 2.1× 417 2.6× 12 1.6k
Hans Juergen Boehmer Germany 18 493 1.0× 566 1.4× 316 0.9× 253 1.2× 190 1.2× 34 1.2k
Rafael Feltran‐Barbieri Brazil 11 528 1.1× 326 0.8× 319 0.9× 236 1.1× 132 0.8× 22 1.2k
Gerald Eilu Uganda 18 298 0.6× 265 0.7× 261 0.8× 260 1.2× 253 1.6× 48 1.1k
Martha Bonilla‐Moheno Mexico 15 731 1.5× 383 1.0× 369 1.1× 170 0.8× 116 0.7× 38 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Griffith. The network helps show where Daniel M. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel M. Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel M. Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel M. Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel M. Griffith. Daniel M. Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sosa, Laura L. de, Marco Panettieri, Daniel M. Griffith, et al.. (2024). Ecosystem function associated with soil organic carbon declines with tropical dry forest degradation. Land Degradation and Development. 35(6). 2109–2121. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2022). Native Hyperaccumulator Plants with Differential Phytoremediation Potential in an Artisanal Gold Mine of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plants. 11(9). 1186–1186. 21 indexed citations
4.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2021). A multifaceted approach to understanding bat community response to disturbance in a seasonally dry tropical forest. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 5667–5667. 4 indexed citations
5.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2021). New altitudinal records of Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae) in the Andean region of Ecuador. Mammalia. 86(2). 190–195.
6.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2020). Understanding the factors limiting organic consumption: the effect of marketing channel on produce price, availability, and price fairness. Organic Agriculture. 11(1). 89–103. 12 indexed citations
7.
Araújo, Cristiano V.M., Daniel M. Griffith, Paul Vargas Jentzsch, et al.. (2017). A novel approach to assessing environmental disturbance based on habitat selection by zebra fish as a model organism. The Science of The Total Environment. 619-620. 906–915. 14 indexed citations
8.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2016). New Population and Range Extension of the Critically Endangered Ecuadorian Brown-Headed Spider Monkey (Ateles Fusciceps Fusciceps) in Western Ecuador. Tropical Conservation Science. 9(1). 167–177. 4 indexed citations
9.
Lizcano, Diego J., et al.. (2016). A camera trap assessment of terrestrial mammals in Machalilla National Park, western Ecuador. Check List. 12(2). 1868–1868. 25 indexed citations
10.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (2015). What do farmers mean when they say they practice conservation agriculture? A comprehensive case study from southern Spain. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 213. 164–177. 20 indexed citations
11.
Moreno-Sánchez, Rocío del Pilar, et al.. (2015). Predicting hunter behavior of indigenous communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon: insights from a household production model. Ecology and Society. 20(4). 7 indexed citations
12.
Navarro‐Cerrillo, Rafael M., Rubén D. Manzanedo, Sergio de‐Miguel, et al.. (2012). Structure and spatio-temporal dynamics of cedar forests along a management gradient in the Middle Atlas, Morocco. Forest Ecology and Management. 289. 341–353. 36 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Brenda B., M. Jahi Chappell, John Vandermeer, et al.. (2011). Effects of industrial agriculture on climate change and the mitigation potential of small-scale agro-ecological farms.. CABI Reviews. 1–18. 59 indexed citations
14.
15.
Harvey, Célia A., Oliver Komar, Robin L. Chazdon, et al.. (2008). Integrating Agricultural Landscapes with Biodiversity Conservation in the Mesoamerican Hotspot. Conservation Biology. 22(1). 8–15. 348 indexed citations
16.
Chazdon, Robin L., Célia A. Harvey, Oliver Komar, et al.. (2008). Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human‐modified Tropical Landscapes. Biotropica. 41(2). 142–153. 379 indexed citations
17.
Ferguson, Bruce G. & Daniel M. Griffith. (2004). Tecnología agrícola y conservación biológica en el Petén, Guatemala. Americanae (AECID Library). 72–85. 3 indexed citations
18.
Griffith, Daniel M.. (2000). Agroforestry: a Refuge for Tropical Biodiversity after Fire. Conservation Biology. 14(1). 325–326. 36 indexed citations
19.
Griffith, Daniel M., et al.. (1997). Forest resources of Maine: 1982 to 1995. 1 indexed citations
20.
Griffith, Daniel M. & Carol L. Alerich. (1996). Forest statistics for Maine, 1995. Forest Service resource bulletin. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark Wishnie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susana Ochoa‐Gaona Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Satoru Okubo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Malvika Onial Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eliane Ceccon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Iris Motzke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hans Juergen Boehmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rafael Feltran‐Barbieri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerald Eilu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martha Bonilla‐Moheno
Rankless by CCL
2026