Daniel M. Goldenholz
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert MossWilliam H. TheodoreMark CookPhilippa J. KarolyDouglas N. GreveDavid A. BoasLouis GagnonKatherine L. Perdue
- Topics
- Epilepsy research and treatment (45 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (26 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel M. Goldenholz
58 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cognitive Neuroscience 978
- Psychiatry and Mental health 882
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 317
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 306
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 231
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Goldenholz
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Goldenholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Goldenholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Goldenholz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Goldenholz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Goldenholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Goldenholz. The network helps show where Daniel M. Goldenholz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel M. Goldenholz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel M. Goldenholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel M. Goldenholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel M. Goldenholz. Daniel M. Goldenholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 222 |
About Daniel M. Goldenholz
Daniel M. Goldenholz is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (45 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (26 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (882 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (978 citations) and Health Informatics (55 citations). Daniel M. Goldenholz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Moss, William H. Theodore, Mark Cook, Philippa J. Karoly, Douglas N. Greve, David A. Boas, Louis Gagnon, Katherine L. Perdue, Dean R. Freestone and Juan Romero. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.