Daniel Lorch

16 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Daniel Lorch
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 310
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 177
  • Developmental Neuroscience 91
  • Gastroenterology 52
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 59
Replace Lois A. Connolly with:
Lois A. Connolly United States
A. Gabriel Germany
Elisabetta Marana Italy
Shunichi Takagi Japan
Rosemary J. Orr United States
B. Scheinin Finland
Isabelle Spahr‐Schopfer Switzerland
Jane Hassell United Kingdom
Katsuo Terui Japan
P. Vila Spain
Daniel Lorch relative to Lois A. Connolly United States Lois A. Connolly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Lois A. Connolly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lorch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lorch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lorch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lorch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lorch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lorch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lorch. The network helps show where Daniel Lorch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lorch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lorch Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lorch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2018200
2 2020107
3 198678
4 201159
5 198848
6 198724
7 202312
8 201110
9 20117
10 19876
11 20242
12 20172
13 20121
14 20221
15 20171
16 19871

About Daniel Lorch

Daniel Lorch is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (2 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (310 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (177 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (91 citations), Gastroenterology (52 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (59 citations). Daniel Lorch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Sahn, Frank Schippers, Douglas K. Rex, Raj Bhandari, David Bernstein, Michael O. Meyers, Gerard A. Silvestri, Gregory Feldman, Jason Akulian and Sean Callahan. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, Acta Haematologica, Journal of Sleep Research, Journal of Pain and Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact