Daniel Le Bourhis
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 30
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 12
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 9
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 9
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 10
- Renal and related cancers 6
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 3
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 4
Daniel Le Bourhis
47 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 752
- Reproductive Medicine 195
- Genetics 637
- Agronomy and Crop Science 221
- Molecular Biology 876
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Le Bourhis
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Le Bourhis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Le Bourhis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Le Bourhis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Le Bourhis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Le Bourhis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Le Bourhis. The network helps show where Daniel Le Bourhis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Le Bourhis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 140 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 312 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 46 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 109 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 23 |
About Daniel Le Bourhis
Daniel Le Bourhis is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (30 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (12 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (9 papers), Renal and related cancers (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (752 citations), Reproductive Medicine (195 citations), Genetics (637 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (221 citations) and Molecular Biology (876 citations). Daniel Le Bourhis has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Paul Renard, Yvan Heyman, Déborah Bourc’his, Delphine Patin, E. Viégas-Pèquignot, Pierre Comizzoli, Alain Niveleau, Xavier Vignon, P. Chesné and Christophe Richard. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, Reproduction, Theriogenology, Scientific Reports and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.