Daniel L. W. Pope

1.8k citations
7 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 6
Topics
Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)

In The Last Decade

Daniel L. W. Pope

7 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance im...20092026201420202009200400600

Peers

Daniel L. W. Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 350
  • Neurology 207
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 194
  • Rehabilitation 108
Replace Tomas Jonsson with:
Tomas Jonsson Sweden
Jamila Andoh Germany
Maria Laura Blefari Switzerland
François Bonnetblanc France
Karl W. Doron United States
Rodolphe Nenert United States
Valeria Della‐Maggiore Argentina
Dirk‐Bart den Ouden United States
Melissa Newhart United States
Paul Fillmore United States
Daniel L. W. Pope relative to Tomas Jonsson Sweden Tomas Jonsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Tomas Jonsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. W. Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. W. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. W. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. W. Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. W. Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. W. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. W. Pope. The network helps show where Daniel L. W. Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. W. Pope

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. W. Pope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. W. Pope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. W. Pope. Daniel L. W. Pope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 424
3 29
4
Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after strokebreakdown →
620
5 309
6 1
7 84

About Daniel L. W. Pope

Daniel L. W. Pope is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Neurology (207 citations) and Rehabilitation (108 citations). Daniel L. W. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Corbetta, Serguei V. Astafiev, Gordon L. Shulman, Mark P. McAvoy, Abraham Z. Snyder, Jennifer Rengachary, Michael Strube, Alex R. Carter, Catherine E. Lang and Lisa Tabor Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Annals of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026