Daniel L. Spitz

701 citations
16 papers · 300 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel L. Spitz

15 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Daniel L. Spitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Reproductive Medicine 157
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 64
  • Oncology 128
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 19
  • Surgery 81
Replace Noriko Sasahara with:
Noriko Sasahara Japan
Sayaka Ueno Japan
Luisa Sánchez‐Lorenzo Spain
Christopher McCann United Kingdom
João Siufi Neto Brazil
ME Sherman United States
Margaret Hill United States
Marion Deslandres France
Domenico Priolo Italy
Xiujie Sheng China
Daniel L. Spitz relative to Noriko Sasahara Japan Noriko Sasahara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Noriko Sasahara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Spitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Spitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Spitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Spitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Spitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Spitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Spitz. The network helps show where Daniel L. Spitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Spitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Spitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Spitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2002178
2 201334
3 201920
4 201918
5 201017
6 20229
7 19886
8 20175
9 20114
10 20153
11 20172
12 20251
13 20141
14 20141
15 20141
16 20250

About Daniel L. Spitz

Daniel L. Spitz is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (157 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (64 citations), Oncology (128 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (19 citations) and Surgery (81 citations). Daniel L. Spitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Linda F. Carson, Maurie Markman, Sheldon Weiner, Linda Van Le, James B. Hall, Mark E. Baker, Ignace Vergote, Charles H. Pippitt, John P. Micha and G. Dark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, American Journal of Hematology and Oncotarget.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact