Daniel Kish
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Lore ThalerJennifer L. MilneMelvyn A. GoodaleMichail AntoniouStephen R. ArnottXinyu ZhangMaarten HornikxMikhail Cherniakov
- Topics
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers)Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeurophysiologyPsychological ScienceProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Daniel Kish
14 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 222
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
- Human-Computer Interaction 58
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 22
- Ecology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kish
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kish more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kish
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kish. The network helps show where Daniel Kish may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Kish
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Kish. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Kish based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Kish. Daniel Kish is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 10 |
About Daniel Kish
Daniel Kish is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 15 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers) and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (222 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations). Daniel Kish has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lore Thaler, Jennifer L. Milne, Melvyn A. Goodale, Michail Antoniou, Stephen R. Arnott, Xinyu Zhang, Maarten Hornikx, Mikhail Cherniakov, Graeme E. Smith and Christopher J. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Psychological Science and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.