Daniel J. Monger

426 citations
11 papers · 373 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry 3
    • Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors 1
    • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 1
    • Insect Utilization and Effects 3

Daniel J. Monger

11 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Monger
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Pharmaceutical Science 71
  • Dermatology 57
  • Biochemistry 43
  • Insect Science 65
  • Surgery 137
Replace Shigeo Serizawa with:
Shigeo Serizawa Japan
Hiroyuki Nishio Japan
Ayano Naoe Japan
Jens‐Uwe Grundmann Germany
K. P. Wittern Germany
Dieter Pollet Germany
Eri Shimizu Japan
Krishnappa Venkatesh United States
Daniel S. Hodgins United States
Sarah T. Pruett United States
Daniel J. Monger relative to Shigeo Serizawa Japan Shigeo Serizawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Shigeo Serizawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Monger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Monger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Monger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Monger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Monger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Monger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Monger. The network helps show where Daniel J. Monger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Monger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Monger Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Monger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 197776
2 198252
3 198848
4 198847
5 198043
6 198729
7 198825
8 198221
9 198919
10 19927
11 19856

About Daniel J. Monger

Daniel J. Monger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (3 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (3 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (71 citations), Dermatology (57 citations), Biochemistry (43 citations), Insect Science (65 citations) and Surgery (137 citations). Daniel J. Monger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George J. Schroepfer, Edward J. Parish, John H. Law, Mary L. Williams, Wendell A. Lim, Ferenc J. Kézdy, Andrew A. Kandutsch, Jeffrey S. Chamberlain, Alemka Kisić and Peter M. Elias. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Clinical Chemistry, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids and Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact