Daniel J. Abramson

463 citations
30 papers · 273 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Abramson

27 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Abramson
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Microbiology 3
  • Dermatology 31
  • Surgery 139
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 36
Replace James Henry Ferguson with:
James Henry Ferguson United States
Paolo Gattuso United States
D. C. Hoffmann Australia
Michael E. Abel United States
J. D. Buchanan United Kingdom
Joseph N. Ward United States
H. K. China
Robert Turell United States
Lebherz Tb United States
James W. Hendrick United States
Daniel J. Abramson relative to James Henry Ferguson United States James Henry Ferguson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
James Henry Ferguson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Abramson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Abramson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Abramson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Abramson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Abramson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Abramson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Abramson. The network helps show where Daniel J. Abramson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Abramson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Abramson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Abramson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195152
2 195534
3 195725
4 196619
5 196915
6 196613
7 197813
8 198312
9 195411
10 197010
11 197510
12 19768
13 19788
14 19868
15 19577
16 19607
17 19584
18 19574
19 19532
20 19582

About Daniel J. Abramson

Daniel J. Abramson is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology and Rheumatology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (8 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (3 citations), Dermatology (31 citations), Surgery (139 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (36 citations). Daniel J. Abramson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Duncan E. Reid, William L. Caton and Charles C. Roby. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Annals of Surgery, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact