Daniel Hořínek

1.1k citations
33 papers · 804 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hořínek

31 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Daniel Hořínek
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 311
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 251
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 161
  • Neurology 126
  • Neurology 63
Replace Krisztina Benedek with:
Krisztina Benedek Denmark
Christopher J.M. Scott Canada
Carol V. Anderson United States
Oliver Martinez United States
Marcie Rabin United States
Bornali Kundu United States
Zafer Keser United States
Aljoscha Thomschewski Austria
Hyunwoo Nam South Korea
Akira Kunimatsu Japan
Daniel Hořínek relative to Krisztina Benedek Denmark Krisztina Benedek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Krisztina Benedek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hořínek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hořínek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hořínek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hořínek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hořínek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hořínek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hořínek. The network helps show where Daniel Hořínek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hořínek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hořínek Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hořínek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012125
2 2013121
3 201054
4 200153
5 201451
6 201443
7 201743
8 201342
9 200935
10 201429
11 201226
12 201225
13
Volume of the amygdala is reduced in patients with narcolepsy - a structural MRI study.
201125
14 201522
15 201421
16 201415
17 201314
18 201210
19 20139
20 20198

About Daniel Hořínek

Daniel Hořínek is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (311 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (251 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (161 citations), Neurology (126 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). Daniel Hořínek has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jakub Hort, Christopher Nimsky, Jan Laczó, Ross Andel, Jiří Lisý, Kateřina Sheardová, Kamil Vlček, Jan Bureš, Zuzana Nedelská and Jan Egger. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Acta Neurochirurgica, Neurology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Child s Nervous System.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact