Daniel Heyner

1.7k total citations
48 papers, 514 citations indexed

About

Daniel Heyner is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Heyner has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 28 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Heyner's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (32 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (28 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (27 papers). Daniel Heyner is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (32 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (28 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (27 papers). Daniel Heyner collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Daniel Heyner's co-authors include U. Motschmann, Karl‐Heinz Glaßmeier, Sven Simon, B. J. Anderson, Ferdinand Plaschke, Yasuhito Narita, M. Volwerk, Johannes Wicht, Tomas Karlsson and Charlotte Goetz and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, The Astrophysical Journal and Geophysical Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Heyner

40 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Heyner Germany 13 487 227 32 27 22 48 514
Lorenzo Trenchi Italy 12 426 0.9× 242 1.1× 16 0.5× 32 1.2× 26 1.2× 18 444
S. L. McGregor United States 10 409 0.8× 142 0.6× 28 0.9× 20 0.7× 30 1.4× 17 427
Tanja Amerstorfer Austria 13 416 0.9× 133 0.6× 37 1.2× 19 0.7× 21 1.0× 25 437
Hironori Shimazu Japan 11 388 0.8× 188 0.8× 17 0.5× 39 1.4× 15 0.7× 28 401
Aoi Nakamizo Japan 10 330 0.7× 169 0.7× 19 0.6× 100 3.7× 13 0.6× 26 338
S. Krishna Prasad United Kingdom 14 489 1.0× 190 0.8× 16 0.5× 13 0.5× 16 0.7× 27 505
Q. M. Zhang China 14 611 1.3× 116 0.5× 18 0.6× 13 0.5× 13 0.6× 21 617
J. Gruesbeck United States 21 1.2k 2.6× 271 1.2× 12 0.4× 20 0.7× 28 1.3× 61 1.3k
B. P. Filippov Russia 16 748 1.5× 203 0.9× 10 0.3× 13 0.5× 21 1.0× 85 773
G. Facskó Hungary 12 564 1.2× 256 1.1× 24 0.8× 107 4.0× 22 1.0× 33 578

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Heyner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Heyner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Heyner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Heyner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Heyner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Heyner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Heyner. The network helps show where Daniel Heyner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Heyner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Heyner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Heyner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Heyner. Daniel Heyner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bowers, C. F., C. M. Jackman, Xianzhe Jia, et al.. (2025). MESSENGER Observations of a Possible Alfvén Wing at Mercury Driven by a Low Alfvénic Mach Number Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 130(3).
2.
Heyner, Daniel, X. Blanco‐Cano, Daniel Schmid, et al.. (2025). Bow Shock Crossing Observations by MESSENGER From a Magnetic Point of View. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 130(10).
3.
Wang, Shan, W. Sun, Xingyu Zhu, et al.. (2025). Statistics of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field from 0.1 to 30 au. II. Dynamical Variability. The Astrophysical Journal. 987(1). 93–93.
4.
Riley, Pete, M. Ben-Nun, Erika Palmerio, et al.. (2025). Understanding the global structure of the September 5, 2022, coronal mass ejection using sunRunner3D. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 15. 17–17.
5.
Temmer, Manuela, Daniele Telloni, Paulett C. Liewer, et al.. (2024). Challenges in Forecasting the Evolution of a Distorted CME Observed During the First Close Solar Orbiter Perihelion. The Astrophysical Journal. 970(1). 81–81.
6.
Palmerio, Erika, J. G. Luhmann, M. L. Mays, et al.. (2024). Improved modelling of SEP event onset within the WSA–Enlil–SEPMOD framework. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 14. 3–3. 5 indexed citations
7.
8.
Heyner, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Revised Magnetospheric Model Reveals Signatures of Field‐Aligned Current Systems at Mercury. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(3).
9.
Volwerk, M., Torgny Karlsson, Daniel Heyner, et al.. (2023). Magnetic holes between Earth and Mercury: BepiColombo cruise phase. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 677. A2–A2.
10.
Plaschke, Ferdinand, et al.. (2023). Study of Extreme Magnetopause Distortions Under Varying Solar Wind Conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 128(8). 6 indexed citations
11.
Jackson, B. V., M. Tokumaru, Kazumasa Iwai, et al.. (2023). Forecasting Heliospheric CME Solar-Wind Parameters Using the UCSD Time-Dependent Tomography and ISEE Interplanetary Scintillation Data: The 10 March 2022 CME. Solar Physics. 298(5). 74–74. 5 indexed citations
12.
Alberti, Tommaso, Anna Milillo, Daniel Heyner, et al.. (2022). The “Singular” Behavior of the Solar Wind Scaling Features during Parker Solar Probe–BepiColombo Radial Alignment. The Astrophysical Journal. 926(2). 174–174. 12 indexed citations
13.
Sun, W., J. A. Slavin, R. Nakamura, et al.. (2022). Dayside magnetopause reconnection and flux transfer events under radial interplanetary magnetic field (IMF): BepiColombo Earth-flyby observations. Annales Geophysicae. 40(2). 217–229. 5 indexed citations
14.
Laker, R., T. S. Horbury, S. D. Bale, et al.. (2021). Multi-spacecraft study of the solar wind at solar minimum: Dependence on latitude and transient outflows. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 9 indexed citations
15.
Sun, W., J. A. Slavin, R. Nakamura, et al.. (2021). Dayside magnetopause reconnection and flux transfer events: BepiColombo earth-Flyby observations. 1 indexed citations
16.
Genova, Antonio, Hauke Hußmann, Tim Van Hoolst, et al.. (2021). Geodesy, Geophysics and Fundamental Physics Investigations of the BepiColombo Mission. Space Science Reviews. 217(2). 34 indexed citations
17.
Narita, Yasuhito, et al.. (2020). Mathematical foundation of Capon's method for planetary magnetic field analysis. Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems. 9(2). 471–481. 7 indexed citations
18.
Volwerk, M., Charlotte Goetz, Ferdinand Plaschke, et al.. (2020). On the magnetic characteristics of magnetic holes in the solar wind between Mercury and Venus. Annales Geophysicae. 38(1). 51–60. 25 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, C. L., R. M. Winslow, B. J. Anderson, et al.. (2013). Induced Magnetic Fields at Mercury from MESSENGER Observations. LPI. 1311. 1 indexed citations
20.
Heyner, Daniel, K. Glassmeier, D. Schmitt, U. Motschmann, & Johannes Wicht. (2009). Concerning the Initial Temporal Evolution of a Hermean Feedback Dynamo. AGUSM. 2009. 3076. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lorenzo Trenchi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. L. McGregor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tanja Amerstorfer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hironori Shimazu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aoi Nakamizo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Krishna Prasad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Q. M. Zhang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Gruesbeck Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. P. Filippov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Facskó
Rankless by CCL
2026