Daniel H. Foil

1.2k citations
27 papers · 797 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel H. Foil

26 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers

Daniel H. Foil
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 308
  • Pharmacology 75
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Infectious Diseases 102
  • Molecular Medicine 25
Replace Bilal Shaker with:
Bilal Shaker South Korea
Prabha Garg India
Utkarsh Raj India
Maria Batool South Korea
Carmen Cerchia Italy
Shaban Ahmad India
Ana C. Puhl United States
Yunierkis Pérez‐Castillo Ecuador
Salma Jamal India
Ren Kong China
Daniel H. Foil relative to Bilal Shaker South Korea Bilal Shaker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
Bilal Shaker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Foil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Foil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Foil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Foil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Foil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Foil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Foil. The network helps show where Daniel H. Foil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel H. Foil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel H. Foil Line = papers co-authored together Daniel H. Foil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202187
2 201883
3 202066
4 202059
5 201555
6 202042
7 202040
8 202136
9 202035
10 202032
11 201727
12 202027
13 201725
14 202124
15 202022
16 202122
17 202021
18 202019
19 202216
20 202115

About Daniel H. Foil

Daniel H. Foil is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (308 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Infectious Diseases (102 citations) and Molecular Medicine (25 citations). Daniel H. Foil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sean Ekins, Kimberley M. Zorn, Thomas R. Lane, Eni Minerali, Ana C. Puhl, Stefano Papazian, Delphine Parrot, Deniz Taşdemir, Victor O. Gawriljuk and Daniel A. Todd. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Molecular Pharmaceutics, ACS Omega and Chemical Research in Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact