Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Cole
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Cole more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Cole. The network helps show where Daniel H. Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel H. Cole
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel H. Cole.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel H. Cole based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel H. Cole. Daniel H. Cole is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cole, Daniel H., Graham Epstein, & Michael D. McGinnis. (2019). Combining the IAD and SES Frameworks. International Journal of the Commons.6 indexed citations
2.
Baldwin, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). The Polycentric Turn: A Case Study of Kenya's Evolving Legal Regime for Irrigation Waters. Natural resources journal. 57(1). 101.3 indexed citations
3.
Cole, Daniel H., Graham Epstein, & Michael D. McGinnis. (2014). Toward a New Institutional Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems (NIASES): Combining Elinor Ostrom's IAD and SES Frameworks. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
Cole, Daniel H.. (2010). New Forms of Private Property: Property Rights in Environmental Goods. Chapters.3 indexed citations
10.
Cole, Daniel H.. (2008). The "Stern Review" and its Critics: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis. Natural resources journal. 48(1). 53.21 indexed citations
11.
Cole, Daniel H.. (2007). The Stern Review and its critics: implications for the theory and practice of costs-benefits analysis. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
12.
Cole, Daniel H.. (2006). Why Kelo Is Not Good News for Local Planners and Developers. Georgia State University law review. 22(4). 14895.5 indexed citations
Cole, Daniel H.. (2000). The Importance of Being Comparative: M. Dale Palmer Professorship Inaugural Lecture. Indiana Law Review.1 indexed citations
16.
Cole, Daniel H. & Peter Z. Grossman. (1998). When is Command-and-Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection. SSRN Electronic Journal.29 indexed citations
17.
Cole, Daniel H., et al.. (1997). Rhetoric, Reality, and the Law of Unfunded Federal Mandates.1 indexed citations
18.
Cole, Daniel H.. (1995). An Outline History of Environmental Law and Administration in Poland. Hastings international and comparative law review. 18(2). 297.1 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Daniel H.. (1992). Debt-Equity Conversions, Debt-for-Nature Swaps, and the Continuing World Debt Crisis. Columbia journal of transnational law.2 indexed citations
20.
Cole, Daniel H.. (1989). Liability Rules for Surface Water Drainage: A Simple Economic Analysis. 161(11). 2182–4.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.