Daniel H. Catlin
- Ecology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Co-authors
- James D. FraserSarah M. KarpantyKelsi L. HuntJonathan B. CohenDaniel K. RosenbergDaniel GibsonSarah LeggeJeffrey R. Walters
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (62 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEGlobal Change Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIreland
In The Last Decade
Daniel H. Catlin
72 papers receiving 989 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Ecology 981
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 302
- Global and Planetary Change 274
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 171
- Ecological Modeling 127
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Catlin
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Catlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Catlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Catlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Catlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Catlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Catlin. The network helps show where Daniel H. Catlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel H. Catlin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel H. Catlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel H. Catlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel H. Catlin. Daniel H. Catlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Daniel H. Catlin
Daniel H. Catlin is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (62 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (981 citations), Ecological Modeling (127 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (302 citations). Daniel H. Catlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include James D. Fraser, Sarah M. Karpanty, Kelsi L. Hunt, Jonathan B. Cohen, Daniel K. Rosenberg, Daniel Gibson, Sarah Legge, Jeffrey R. Walters, Samantha G. Robinson and Cheri L. Gratto‐Trevor. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Global Change Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.