Daniel Greenberg

31 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Daniel Greenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Ecological Modeling 30
  • Applied Psychology 25
  • History and Philosophy of Science 12
  • Global and Planetary Change 54
  • Ecology 56
Replace W. T. Jones with:
W. T. Jones United States
David Will United States
Julia E. H. Brown United States
Daniel J. Reed United States
Andrew Davison United Kingdom
Michael Fortescue Denmark
María Fabiana Laguna Argentina
José Luis González Spain
Richard E. W. Berl United States
Michael Fisher United States
Daniel Greenberg relative to W. T. Jones United States W. T. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
W. T. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Greenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Greenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Greenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Greenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Greenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Greenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Greenberg. The network helps show where Daniel Greenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Greenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Greenberg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Greenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201340
2 201728
3 201824
4 201224
5 201923
6 196019
7 201615
8 201512
9
Legacy of Trust: Life After the Sudbury Valley School Experience
199211
10 19668
11 19658
12 19648
13 20207
14 20217
15 19717
16
Education in America: A View from Sudbury Valley
19937
17 20196
18 20225
19 20225
20 20194

About Daniel Greenberg

Daniel Greenberg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Infectious Diseases and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (30 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations), Global and Planetary Change (54 citations) and Ecology (56 citations). Daniel Greenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include David M. Green, Douglas S. Fudge, H. M. Foley, Brian Leung, Amanda D. Castel, Brittany Wilbourn, William Charlton, Lorien C. Abroms, Owen R. Jones and Yike Guo. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Serious Games, Phronesis, Games for Health Journal, Physics Today and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact