Daniel Gray

505 citations
13 papers · 348 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gray

13 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Daniel Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Accounting 118
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 72
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 15
  • Social Psychology 115
  • Health 40
Replace Peter Agyemang‐Mintah with:
Peter Agyemang‐Mintah United Arab Emirates
Manfred Kets De Vries France
Şaziye Gazîoğlu United Kingdom
Ghulam Murtaza France
Emiliano Sironi Italy
Keke Wu United States
Nancy D. Ursel Canada
Neha Garg India
David A. Foote United States
Nandan Prabhu India
Daniel Gray relative to Peter Agyemang‐Mintah United Arab Emirates Peter Agyemang‐Mintah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Peter Agyemang‐Mintah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gray. The network helps show where Daniel Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gray Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2015162
2 201594
3 201533
4 202115
5 202111
6 201910
7 20146
8 20145
9
How Has the Liquidity Saving Mechanism Reduced Banks’ Intraday Liquidity Costs in CHAPS?
20143
10 20213
11 20213
12 20242
13 20211

About Daniel Gray

Daniel Gray is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (7 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Social Capital and Networks (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (2 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers) and Cooperative Studies and Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (118 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (72 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 citations), Social Psychology (115 citations) and Health (40 citations). Daniel Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Brown, Jolian McHardy, Karl Taylor, Jennifer Roberts, Alberto Montagnoli, Mirko Moro, Mark N. Harris, Christopher Spencer, Matthew D. Rablen and Pulak Ghosh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Empirical Finance, Economics Letters, Journal of Economic Psychology and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact