Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Neurology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications 2
- Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials 1
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 2
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Alexandra E. Porter (7 shared papers)David T. Dexter (6 shared papers)Angela E. Goode (5 shared papers)Kazunori Kataoka (4 shared papers)Xueying Liu (4 shared papers)Theofilus A. Tockary (3 shared papers)Yasutaka Anraku (3 shared papers)Kazuko Toh (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nanoscale (2 papers)Biomaterials (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Neuroendocrinology (1 paper)Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter
12 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Biomaterials 200
- Neurology 75
- Pharmaceutical Science 47
- Developmental Neuroscience 31
- Biomedical Engineering 202
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter. The network helps show where Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 |
About Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter
Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomaterials, Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (1 paper) and Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (200 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (47 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (202 citations). Daniel Gonzalez‐Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra E. Porter, David T. Dexter, Angela E. Goode, Kazunori Kataoka, Xueying Liu, Theofilus A. Tockary, Yasutaka Anraku, Kazuko Toh, Anjaneyulu Dirisala and Milo S. P. Shaffer. Their work appears in journals such as Nanoscale, Biomaterials, Scientific Reports, Journal of Neuroendocrinology and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.