Daniel G. Brenner

22 papers receiving 742 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Brenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Molecular Medicine 134
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 214
  • Molecular Biology 454
  • Immunology 132
  • Biotechnology 47
Replace Beat Wipf with:
Beat Wipf Switzerland
Jaehoon Yu South Korea
Mei-Chu Lo United States
Sanjay S. Khandekar United States
John E. Mott United States
James Wells United States
Solmaz Sobhanifar Canada
Roger Camble United Kingdom
Marc Vanhove Belgium
Kesavan Radika United States
Daniel G. Brenner relative to Beat Wipf Switzerland Beat Wipf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Beat Wipf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Brenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Brenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Brenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Brenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Brenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Brenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Brenner. The network helps show where Daniel G. Brenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Brenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Brenner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Brenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994240
2 198191
3 198568
4 198962
5 198558
6 199353
7 197951
8 198443
9
Effects of recombinant neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) on the growth of lung cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo.
199834
10 198528
11 198523
12 198423
13 199517
14 201714
15 19829
16 19852
17 19862
18 20142
19 19861
20 19901

About Daniel G. Brenner

Daniel G. Brenner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Pharmacology and Molecular Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (134 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (214 citations), Molecular Biology (454 citations), Immunology (132 citations) and Biotechnology (47 citations). Daniel G. Brenner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy R. Knowles, William V. Shaw, Grety Rihs, Stanley N. Cohen, Sue Lin‐Chao, Aya Jakobovits, Joshua Boger, Hirohisa Tsuda, Masato Noguchi and Michael J. Mendez. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Technology Knowledge and Learning, Gene and Current topics in cellular regulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact