Daniel Fourmy

4.7k citations
130 papers · 4.1k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Fourmy

128 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Fourmy
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 567
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 94
  • Oncology 153
  • Biomedical Engineering 228
Replace Graham S. Baldwin with:
Graham S. Baldwin Australia
Paolo Grieco Italy
Stephen J. Yarwood United Kingdom
Roman N. Skryma France
Chih‐Cheng Chien Taiwan
Hang‐zi Chen China
Antao Dai China
Matthias Ulrich Kassack Germany
Won‐Sik Shim South Korea
Rong Xu China
Daniel Fourmy relative to Graham S. Baldwin Australia Graham S. Baldwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.5×
Graham S. Baldwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Fourmy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Fourmy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Fourmy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Fourmy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Fourmy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Fourmy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Fourmy. The network helps show where Daniel Fourmy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Fourmy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Fourmy Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Fourmy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006398
2 1993115
3 200999
4 201796
5 200292
6 201487
7 199980
8 200673
9 199872
10 200669
11 199967
12 200267
13 200561
14 199760
15 200160
16 199359
17 202159
18 199756
19 199955
20 200255

About Daniel Fourmy

Daniel Fourmy is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 130 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (45 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (20 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (2 papers) and Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (567 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (94 citations), Oncology (153 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (228 citations). Daniel Fourmy has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Marlène Dufresne, Catherine Seva, Chantal Escrieut, Lucien Pradayrol, Nicole Vaysse, Véronique Gigoux, Pascal Clerc, Sandrine Silvente‐Poirot, Bernard Maigret and Luis Moroder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Molecular Pharmacology, European Journal of Biochemistry, Regulatory Peptides and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact