Daniel Ferguson

792 total citations
21 papers, 487 citations indexed

About

Daniel Ferguson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Ferguson has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 487 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Ferguson's work include Evolution and Science Education (8 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (6 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers). Daniel Ferguson is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Science Education (8 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (6 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers). Daniel Ferguson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Fiji and Russia. Daniel Ferguson's co-authors include Jamie L. Jensen, Bradford K. Berges, Brian D. Poole, Carter Stancil, Abraham Quaye, Savannah Hughes, Jennifer Brown, Sarah Barber, Seth Bybee and Richard Gill and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, CBE—Life Sciences Education and Vaccines.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Ferguson

19 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Daniel Ferguson
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Health 361
  • Infectious Diseases 234
  • Sociology and Political Science 171
  • Modeling and Simulation 116
  • Economics and Econometrics 113
Replace Mark A. Largent with:
Mark A. Largent United States
Shimaa M. Saied Egypt
Marta Caserotti Italy
Katherine Kricorian United States
Ariel Fridman United States
Elaine Robertson United Kingdom
Kate Sollis Australia
Lauren Rauh United States
Marie Fly Lindholt Denmark
Yaqi Chen China
Mark A. Largent United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Daniel Ferguson
Daniel Ferguson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Daniel Ferguson
Daniel Ferguson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. The network helps show where Daniel Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Ferguson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Ferguson. Daniel Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 3
6 3
7 6
8 14
9 9
10
FAQs: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
2
11
Judicial Review and Courts Bill
1
12
Coronavirus: the lockdown laws
11
13 367
14 20
15 2
16 27
17
Patient representatives and the law.
1
18 3
19 6
20 6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026