Dániel Érces

633 citations
38 papers · 475 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dániel Érces

37 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Dániel Érces
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Biological Psychiatry 40
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 63
  • Gastroenterology 35
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
  • Developmental Neuroscience 21
Replace Kenneth S. Helmer with:
Kenneth S. Helmer United States
Dorien Kiers Netherlands
David Palange United States
M. Truschnig‐Wilders Austria
Yongli Han China
Hongmin Luo China
Thorbjørn Grøfte Denmark
Süleyman Ayvaz Türkiye
Puntip Tantiwong United States
Jyotirmoy Nandi United States
Dániel Érces relative to Kenneth S. Helmer United States Kenneth S. Helmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.5×
Kenneth S. Helmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dániel Érces

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dániel Érces's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dániel Érces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dániel Érces more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dániel Érces

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dániel Érces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dániel Érces. The network helps show where Dániel Érces may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dániel Érces, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dániel Érces Line = papers co-authored together Dániel Érces links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012115
2 201152
3 201240
4 201327
5 201224
6 201521
7 201419
8 201718
9 201218
10 202213
11 201711
12 201410
13 201910
14 20229
15 20138
16 20207
17 20157
18 20146
19 20216
20 20165

About Dániel Érces

Dániel Érces is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (5 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (5 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers) and Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (40 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (63 citations), Gastroenterology (35 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (21 citations). Dániel Érces has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include József Kaszaki, Mihály Boros, Gabriella Varga, Tünde Tőkés, Miklós Ghyczy, Csilla Torday, Krisztina Kupai, László Vécsei, Zsolt Molnár and Andrea Szabó. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Shock and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact