Daniel Epstein

1.3k citations
25 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Epstein

24 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

Daniel Epstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 832
  • Ophthalmology 202
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
  • Epidemiology 105
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 28
Replace Tunji Sunday Oluleye with:
Tunji Sunday Oluleye Nigeria
Akbar Derakhshan Iran
Rakhee Shah United Kingdom
Fernando Molle Italy
Kovin Naidoo South Africa
L. A. Jones United States
Alireza Mirshahi Germany
Xuehan Qian China
Rebecca Weng Australia
Annette Giangiacomo United States
Daniel Epstein relative to Tunji Sunday Oluleye Nigeria Tunji Sunday Oluleye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.0×
Tunji Sunday Oluleye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Epstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Epstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Epstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Epstein. The network helps show where Daniel Epstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Epstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Epstein Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Epstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011178
2 1993168
3 2012164
4 1994137
5 199762
6 199438
7 199438
8 199135
9 201029
10 198128
11 200717
12 200716
13 200715
14 199612
15 201211
16 199411
17 201511
18 198310
19 19988
20 19846

About Daniel Epstein

Daniel Epstein is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (832 citations), Ophthalmology (202 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations), Epidemiology (105 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations). Daniel Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Per Fagerholm, Heléne Hamberg‐Nyström, Björn Tengroth, Elena Albè, Paolo Vinciguerra, Silvia Trazza, Thomas Fitzsimmons, Béatrice E. Frueh, Kathrin Laaser and Friedrich E. Kruse. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmology, Cornea and Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact