Daniel Decker

878 total citations
11 papers, 604 citations indexed

About

Daniel Decker is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Decker has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 604 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Decker's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (1 paper). Daniel Decker is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (1 paper). Daniel Decker collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel Decker's co-authors include Lincoln R. Larson, Caren B. Cooper, Richard C. Stedman, Ashley A. Dayer, Arthur L. Wilson, Daniela B. Raik, John F. Organ, W. Chris Wozencraft, Shawn J. Riley and Len H. Carpenter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Mammalogy and Conservation Letters.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Decker

9 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Decker United States	6	275	182	171	141	95	11	604
Leeann Sullivan United States	8	234 0.9×	147 0.8×	162 0.9×	143 1.0×	99 1.0×	13	509
Alia M. Dietsch United States	14	395 1.4×	149 0.8×	235 1.4×	161 1.1×	140 1.5×	33	795
Tracy Dobson United States	8	253 0.9×	302 1.7×	108 0.6×	195 1.4×	92 1.0×	18	671
Matthew J. Selinske Australia	12	142 0.5×	279 1.5×	153 0.9×	248 1.8×	129 1.4×	31	686
Marna Herbst South Africa	9	185 0.7×	246 1.4×	134 0.8×	51 0.4×	187 2.0×	14	616
Ryo Sakurai Japan	13	223 0.8×	160 0.9×	149 0.9×	135 1.0×	94 1.0×	50	664
Ugo Arbieu Germany	13	183 0.7×	172 0.9×	115 0.7×	60 0.4×	62 0.7×	26	473
Francisco Zorondo‐Rodríguez Chile	13	154 0.6×	196 1.1×	105 0.6×	83 0.6×	110 1.2×	28	572
Olve Krange Norway	14	336 1.2×	203 1.1×	100 0.6×	146 1.0×	290 3.1×	40	855
Chelsea Batavia United States	12	185 0.7×	168 0.9×	104 0.6×	114 0.8×	113 1.2×	23	590

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Decker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Decker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Decker. The network helps show where Daniel Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Decker. Daniel Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Decker, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Extension as a Multilevel Bridging Organization: Supporting Networked Environmental Governance. Journal of Extension. 57(5). 3 indexed citations

2.

Cooper, Caren B., Lincoln R. Larson, Ashley A. Dayer, Richard C. Stedman, & Daniel Decker. (2015). Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Wildlife Management. 79(3). 446–457. 180 indexed citations

3.

Decker, Daniel, Christian A. Smith, Ann B. Forstchen, et al.. (2015). Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century. Conservation Letters. 9(4). 290–295. 81 indexed citations

4.

Siemer, William F., et al.. (2014). Activities and Satisfactions of Fall Turkey Hunters in New York State. eCommons (Cornell University).

5.

Decker, Daniel. (2012). Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management. Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks. 117 indexed citations

6.

Raik, Daniela B., Arthur L. Wilson, & Daniel Decker. (2008). Power in Natural Resources Management: An Application of Theory. Society & Natural Resources. 21(8). 729–739. 99 indexed citations

7.

Hoffmann, Jörg, et al.. (2006). Sensor misst Verschmutzung der Reinigungsflüssigkeit. JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik. 46(12). 56–59.

8.

Riley, Shawn J., et al.. (2003). Adaptive Impact Management: An Integrative Approach to Wildlife Management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 8(2). 81–95. 79 indexed citations

9.

Decker, Daniel & W. Chris Wozencraft. (1991). Phylogenetic Analysis of Recent Procyonid Genera. Journal of Mammalogy. 72(1). 42–55. 41 indexed citations

10.

Decker, Daniel, et al.. (1984). Does chloroform exposure while showering pose a serious public health concern?. Medical Hypotheses. 15(2). 119–123. 3 indexed citations

11.

Gutiérrez, Ralph J., Rebecca J. Howard, & Daniel Decker. (1979). Hunting ethics, self-limitation, and the role of succinylcholine chloride in bow hunting. 7. 170–172. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact