Daniel De Moulin
- Topics
- Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- PubMed
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel De Moulin
5 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Surgery 39
- Gastroenterology 21
- Cancer Research 21
- Oncology 12
- Genetics 11
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel De Moulin
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel De Moulin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel De Moulin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel De Moulin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel De Moulin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel De Moulin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel De Moulin. The network helps show where Daniel De Moulin may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Paul Barbette, M.D.: a seventeenth-century Amsterdam author of best-selling textbooks. | 28 |
| 5 | 27 |
About Daniel De Moulin
Daniel De Moulin is a scholar working on Anthropology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 5 papers that have together received 87 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (21 citations), Anatomy (2 citations) and Cancer Research (21 citations). Daniel De Moulin has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Their work appears in journals such as PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.