Daniel D. Gregory
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Ross R. LargeSebastién MeffreJeffrey A. SteadmanTimothy W. LyonsMichael J. BakerAdrian FabrisPeter McGoldrickStephen Kuhn
- Topics
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (15 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (10 papers)Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel D. Gregory
16 papers receiving 349 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Artificial Intelligence 256
- Geophysics 224
- Geochemistry and Petrology 105
- Mechanics of Materials 54
- Mechanical Engineering 54
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Gregory
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Gregory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Gregory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Gregory. The network helps show where Daniel D. Gregory may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel D. Gregory
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel D. Gregory. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel D. Gregory based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel D. Gregory. Daniel D. Gregory is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 137 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 94 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Daniel D. Gregory
Daniel D. Gregory is a scholar working on Fuel Technology, Geochemistry and Petrology and Geophysics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (15 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (10 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (105 citations), Geophysics (224 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (256 citations). Daniel D. Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ross R. Large, Sebastién Meffre, Jeffrey A. Steadman, Timothy W. Lyons, Michael J. Baker, Adrian Fabris, Peter McGoldrick, Stephen Kuhn, В. В. Масленников and N Fox. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.