Daniel Cork

611 total citations
20 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Daniel Cork is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Cork has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Statistics and Probability, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Cork's work include Census and Population Estimation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). Daniel Cork is often cited by papers focused on Census and Population Estimation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). Daniel Cork collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Daniel Cork's co-authors include Alfred Blumstein, Robert M. Groves, Paul R. Voss, Constance F. Citro, Jacqueline Cohen, John Engberg, George Tita, Mark S. Scher, Bobby L. Jones and Howard Seltman and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Value in Health and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Cork

16 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Cork United States	8	250	95	57	55	41	20	358
Jennifer B. Robinson United States	6	274 1.1×	38 0.4×	135 2.4×	103 1.9×	81 2.0×	8	398
Elizabeth D. Brown United States	6	146 0.6×	15 0.2×	76 1.3×	151 2.7×	73 1.8×	10	323
Greg S. Weaver United States	9	208 0.8×	63 0.7×	63 1.1×	70 1.3×	41 1.0×	17	311
Richard L. Linster United States	6	338 1.4×	36 0.4×	38 0.7×	215 3.9×	79 1.9×	6	389
Avinash Singh Bhati United States	11	335 1.3×	39 0.4×	55 1.0×	113 2.1×	87 2.1×	20	423
Karl-Heinz Reuband Germany	8	148 0.6×	14 0.1×	55 1.0×	36 0.7×	38 0.9×	73	265
Thomas Loughran United States	7	269 1.1×	11 0.1×	28 0.5×	70 1.3×	21 0.5×	13	324
Martti Lehti Finland	13	497 2.0×	191 2.0×	49 0.9×	164 3.0×	44 1.1×	51	566
Drew Humphries United States	10	222 0.9×	45 0.5×	28 0.5×	56 1.0×	56 1.4×	17	331
Rolando V. del Carmen United States	11	225 0.9×	35 0.4×	10 0.2×	59 1.1×	30 0.7×	31	324

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cork

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cork

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cork. The network helps show where Daniel Cork may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Cork

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Cork. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Cork based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Cork. Daniel Cork is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Cork, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Health Technology Assessment of Gene Therapies for Inherited Genetic Disorders in the US and Europe. Value in Health. 21. S210–S210. 2 indexed citations

Cork, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Should Professional Boxing Change Its Scoring System? A Comparison of Current and Proposed Methods. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 37. e00243–e00243.

Cork, Daniel, Shawn L. Ralston, & Anne Curry. (2018). A Review of Health Technology Assessments (HTA) of PCSK9 Inhibitors (PSCK9I). Value in Health. 21. S68–S68. 1 indexed citations

Cork, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Assessment of Public Opinion Regarding The Ethics of Nice CDF, HST, and End-of-Life Criteria for Drug Reimbursement. Value in Health. 20(9). A697–A697. 1 indexed citations

Ralston, Stuart H., et al.. (2017). A Comparison of The Nice Highly Specialised Technology (HST) Programme with Assessment By The National Authority For Health (HAS; France), And The Federal Joint Committee (G-BA; Germany). Value in Health. 20(9). A569–A570. 1 indexed citations

Lauritsen, Janet L. & Daniel Cork. (2017). Expanding Our Understanding of Crime. Criminology & Public Policy. 16(4). 1075–1098. 5 indexed citations

Citro, Constance F., et al.. (2013). The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Cork, Daniel, Michael L. Cohen, & Benjamin F. King. (2013). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Cork, Daniel, Vijayan N. Nair, & John E. Rolph. (2010). SOME FORENSIC ASPECTS OF BALLISTIC IMAGING. The Fordham urban law journal/Fordham urban law journal. 38(2). 473. 2 indexed citations

10.

Eddy, William F., Constance F. Citro, & Daniel Cork. (2010). Principles and Practices for the Federal Statistical System: The View from the Committee on National Statistics. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 631(1). 210–224. 2 indexed citations

11.

Brown, Lawrence D., Michael L. Cohen, & Daniel Cork. (2008). Experimentation and evaluation plans for the 2010 census : interim report. National Academies Press eBooks.

12.

Groves, Robert M. & Daniel Cork. (2008). Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey. 24 indexed citations

13.

Voss, Paul R. & Daniel Cork. (2006). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. 18 indexed citations

14.

Cork, Daniel, et al.. (2004). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. 25 indexed citations

15.

Scher, Mark S., Bobby L. Jones, Doris A. Steppe, et al.. (2003). Functional brain maturation in neonates as measured by EEG-sleep analyses. Clinical Neurophysiology. 114(5). 875–882. 36 indexed citations

16.

Cork, Daniel, Michael P. Cohen, Michael R. Rand, & Callie Marie Rennison. (2002). Window on Washington. CHANCE. 15(1). 47–51. 12 indexed citations

17.

Lee, Herbert K. H., et al.. (2002). Did Lennox Lewis beat Evander Holyfield?: methods for analysing small sample interrater agreement problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). 51(2). 129–146. 4 indexed citations

18.

Cork, Daniel. (1999). Examining Space–Time Interaction in City-Level Homicide Data: Crack Markets and the Diffusion of Guns Among Youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 15(4). 379–406. 107 indexed citations

19.

Cohen, Jacqueline, Daniel Cork, John Engberg, & George Tita. (1998). The Role of Drug Markets and Gangs in Local Homicide Rates. Homicide Studies. 2(3). 241–262. 33 indexed citations

20.

Blumstein, Alfred & Daniel Cork. (1996). Linking Gun Availability to Youth Gun Violence. Law and Contemporary Problems. 59(1). 5–5. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact