Daniel C. Fehder

841 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 416 citations indexed

About

Daniel C. Fehder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel C. Fehder has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 416 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 7 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Daniel C. Fehder's work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (7 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers). Daniel C. Fehder is often cited by papers focused on Private Equity and Venture Capital (7 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers). Daniel C. Fehder collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Daniel C. Fehder's co-authors include Yael V. Hochberg, Fiona Murray, Susan L. Cohen, Scott Stern, Fiona Murray, Joseph Raffiee, Pai-Ling Yin, Milan Miric, Florenta Teodoridis and Fiona Murray and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Financial Economics and Strategic Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

Daniel C. Fehder

15 papers receiving 405 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The design of startup accelerators

2019 249 citations Susan L. Cohen, Daniel C. Fehder et al. Research Policy profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel C. Fehder United States	8	266	210	113	78	48	17	416
Paige Clayton United States	8	228 0.9×	117 0.6×	83 0.7×	93 1.2×	41 0.9×	17	312
Brad Feld	4	270 1.0×	143 0.7×	94 0.8×	78 1.0×	33 0.7×	5	357
Julian Frankish United Kingdom	11	330 1.2×	236 1.1×	282 2.5×	72 0.9×	81 1.7×	17	481
Nigel Wadeson United Kingdom	9	193 0.7×	100 0.5×	95 0.8×	135 1.7×	71 1.5×	20	338
Mikael Samuelsson Sweden	10	397 1.5×	272 1.3×	210 1.9×	132 1.7×	137 2.9×	20	586
Tendai Chimucheka South Africa	12	221 0.8×	66 0.3×	88 0.8×	60 0.8×	68 1.4×	36	400
Christoph Hornych Germany	7	223 0.8×	116 0.6×	88 0.8×	128 1.6×	58 1.2×	12	348
Ignatius Ekanem United Kingdom	12	183 0.7×	132 0.6×	92 0.8×	99 1.3×	121 2.5×	27	431
Watson Ladzani South Africa	7	205 0.8×	73 0.3×	75 0.7×	77 1.0×	79 1.6×	26	365
Curtis R. Sproul United States	5	267 1.0×	106 0.5×	74 0.7×	61 0.8×	112 2.3×	8	362

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Fehder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Fehder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Fehder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Fehder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Fehder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Fehder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Fehder. The network helps show where Daniel C. Fehder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Fehder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Fehder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Fehder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Fehder. Daniel C. Fehder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2025). Innovation and capital. Journal of Financial Economics. 169. 104029–104029.

2.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2024). The partisanship of American inventors. Research Policy. 53(7). 105034–105034. 2 indexed citations

3.

Raffiee, Joseph, Florenta Teodoridis, & Daniel C. Fehder. (2023). Partisan patent examiners? Exploring the link between the political ideology of patent examiners and patent office outcomes. Research Policy. 52(9). 104853–104853. 6 indexed citations

4.

Fehder, Daniel C.. (2023). Coming from a Good Pond: The Influence of a New Venture’s Founding Ecosystem on Accelerator Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. 69(1). 1–38. 5 indexed citations

5.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2023). University Research, Technological Commercialization, and Location. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2023(1).

6.

Miric, Milan, Pai-Ling Yin, & Daniel C. Fehder. (2022). Population-Level Evidence of the Gender Gap in Technology Entrepreneurship. Strategy Science. 8(1). 62–84. 11 indexed citations

7.

Raffiee, Joseph, Daniel C. Fehder, & Florenta Teodoridis. (2022). Revealing the revealed preferences of public firm CEOs and top executives: A new database from credit card spending. Strategic Management Journal. 43(10). 2042–2065. 3 indexed citations

8.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2020). The Virtuous Cycle of Innovation and Capital Flows. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

9.

Banerjee, Subhash, et al.. (2019). The Market Reacts Quickly: Changes in Paclitaxel Vascular Device Purchasing Within the Ascension Healthcare System. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 32(1). 18–24. 8 indexed citations

10.

Cohen, Susan L., Daniel C. Fehder, Yael V. Hochberg, & Fiona Murray. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy. 48(7). 1781–1797. 249 indexed citations breakdown →

11.

Fehder, Daniel C., Michael E. Porter, & Scott Stern. (2019). Economic Institutions and Social Progress. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 109. 350–356. 7 indexed citations

12.

Fehder, Daniel C. & Fiona Murray. (2018). Evaluation of Early-Stage Ventures: Bias across Different Evaluation Regimes. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018(1). 17519–17519. 3 indexed citations

13.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2018). The Empirics of Social Progress: The Interplay between Subjective Well-Being and Societal Performance. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 108. 477–482. 19 indexed citations

14.

Hochberg, Yael V. & Daniel C. Fehder. (2015). Accelerators and ecosystems. Science. 348(6240). 1202–1203. 24 indexed citations

15.

Fehder, Daniel C. & Yael V. Hochberg. (2014). Accelerators and the Regional Supply of Venture Capital Investment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 53 indexed citations

16.

Fehder, Daniel C., Fiona Murray, & Scott Stern. (2014). Intellectual property rights and the evolution of scientific journals as knowledge platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 36. 83–94. 18 indexed citations

17.

Fehder, Daniel C., et al.. (2008). Innovation and price: the case of digital cameras. Applied Economics. 41(17). 2229–2236. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact