Daniel C. Burnston

622 citations
27 papers · 282 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Burnston

27 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Burnston
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • History and Philosophy of Science 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 169
  • General Psychology 6
  • Social Psychology 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
Replace Sara Bizarro with:
Sara Bizarro Portugal
Jennifer Mundale United States
Mazviita Chirimuuta United States
David Colaço Germany
Vicente Raja Canada
Corey J. Maley United States
John Kulvicki United States
Philipp Haueis Germany
Mario Villalobos Chile
Austen Clark United States
Daniel C. Burnston relative to Sara Bizarro Portugal Sara Bizarro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Sara Bizarro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Burnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Burnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Burnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Burnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Burnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Burnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Burnston. The network helps show where Daniel C. Burnston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Burnston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Burnston Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Burnston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201338
2 201638
3 201430
4 201729
5 201626
6 201918
7 201617
8 201410
9 201710
10 20168
11 20177
12 20126
13 20216
14
Mechanistic Diagrams as Search Organizers
20136
15 20225
16 20115
17
Representing Time in Scientific Diagrams
20144
18 20203
19 20213
20
Perceptual Context and the Nature of Neural Function
20153

About Daniel C. Burnston

Daniel C. Burnston is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Social Psychology (92 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations). Daniel C. Burnston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include William Bechtel, Adele Abrahamsen, Pim Haselager, Sebo Uithol and Jonathan Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy of Science, Mind & Language, Croatian Journal of Philosophy and Consciousness and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact