Daniel Bodri

1.7k total citations
34 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Daniel Bodri is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Bodri has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 22 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Daniel Bodri's work include Ovarian function and disorders (22 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (22 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (21 papers). Daniel Bodri is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (22 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (22 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (21 papers). Daniel Bodri collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Japan and Sri Lanka. Daniel Bodri's co-authors include Juan José Guillén, Satoshi Kawachiya, Oriol Coll, Keiichi Kato, Osamu Kato, Y. Takehara, V. Vernaeve, Tsunekazu Matsumoto, Arri Coomarasamy and R. Vidal and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Bodri

32 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Bodri Spain 19 811 777 650 98 97 34 1.1k
Gary S. Nakhuda United States 16 518 0.6× 451 0.6× 199 0.3× 64 0.7× 54 0.6× 37 767
B. Hodes-Wertz United States 11 540 0.7× 656 0.8× 609 0.9× 110 1.1× 83 0.9× 30 958
Johan Hazekamp Sweden 10 539 0.7× 420 0.5× 771 1.2× 72 0.7× 65 0.7× 14 952
Barbro E. Fridén Sweden 15 562 0.7× 350 0.5× 432 0.7× 33 0.3× 44 0.5× 20 867
P. Lutjen Australia 8 720 0.9× 570 0.7× 417 0.6× 52 0.5× 97 1.0× 12 974
John Peek New Zealand 15 464 0.6× 380 0.5× 498 0.8× 75 0.8× 158 1.6× 33 850
Joanne Gunby Canada 19 796 1.0× 694 0.9× 493 0.8× 48 0.5× 75 0.8× 34 1.1k
Ana L. Mauri Brazil 22 901 1.1× 744 1.0× 392 0.6× 52 0.5× 59 0.6× 48 1.0k
Juana Crespo Spain 14 1.4k 1.7× 1.3k 1.7× 609 0.9× 79 0.8× 185 1.9× 27 1.6k
Rob E. Bernardus Netherlands 18 681 0.8× 508 0.7× 420 0.6× 66 0.7× 66 0.7× 32 860

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bodri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bodri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bodri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bodri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bodri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bodri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bodri. The network helps show where Daniel Bodri may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Bodri

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Bodri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Bodri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Bodri. Daniel Bodri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Cumulative live birth rates following insemination with donor spermatozoa in single women, same-sex couples and heterosexual patients. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 41(6). 1007–1014. 8 indexed citations
2.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Shared motherhood IVF: high delivery rates in a large study of treatments for lesbian couples using partner-donated eggs. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 36(2). 130–136. 31 indexed citations
3.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Blastocyst collapse is not an independent predictor of reduced live birth: a time-lapse study. Fertility and Sterility. 105(6). 1476–1483.e3. 41 indexed citations
5.
Merhi, Zaher, et al.. (2015). Minimal stimulation IVF vs conventional IVF: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 214(1). 96.e1–96.e8. 33 indexed citations
6.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2015). Time-lapse monitoring of zona pellucida-free embryos obtained through in vitro fertilization: a retrospective case series. Fertility and Sterility. 103(5). e35–e35. 12 indexed citations
9.
Ueno, Satoshi, Daniel Bodri, Kazuo Uchiyama, et al.. (2014). Developmental potential of zona pellucida–free oocytes obtained following mild in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility. 102(6). 1602–1607. 19 indexed citations
10.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Cumulative success rates following mild IVF in unselected infertile patients: a 3-year, single-centre cohort study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 28(5). 572–581. 30 indexed citations
11.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Oocyte retrieval timing based on spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge during natural cycle in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertility and Sterility. 101(4). 1001–1007.e2. 10 indexed citations
12.
Kato, Keiichi, Y. Takehara, Tomoya Segawa, et al.. (2012). Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 10(1). 35–35. 81 indexed citations
13.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2011). Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility. 95(7). 2263–2268.e1. 31 indexed citations
14.
Kawachiya, Satoshi, et al.. (2011). Blastocyst culture is associated with an elevated incidence of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility. 95(6). 2140–2142. 58 indexed citations
15.
Kato, Osamu, Daniel Bodri, Tomoko Kuroda, et al.. (2011). Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 161(1). 46–50. 86 indexed citations
16.
Bodri, Daniel, Sesh Kamal Sunkara, & Arri Coomarasamy. (2010). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists versus antagonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in oocyte donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility. 95(1). 164–169. 59 indexed citations
18.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2009). Triggering with HCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist treated oocyte donation cycles: a randomised clinical trial. Gynecological Endocrinology. 25(1). 60–66. 63 indexed citations
19.
Bodri, Daniel, et al.. (2007). Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 88(6). 1548–1553. 16 indexed citations
20.
Vernaeve, V., et al.. (2007). Endometrial receptivity after oocyte donation in recipients with a history of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Human Reproduction. 22(11). 2863–2867. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026