Dana Russell

18 total papers · 529 total citations
11 papers, 350 citations indexed

About

Dana Russell is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana Russell has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 350 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Dana Russell's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers). Dana Russell is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers). Dana Russell collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Dana Russell's co-authors include Elisa T. Lee, Vivian S. Lee, Min Lü, Jennifer Lee, Min Liu, E. T. Lee, H. Keen, Ronald Kingsley, Jeunliang Yeh and P. H. Bennett and has published in prestigious journals such as Diabetes Care, Diabetes and Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Dana Russell

11 papers receiving 330 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Dana Russell	157	152	129	49	41	11	350
Núria Alcubierre	126 0.8×	102 0.7×	100 0.8×	5 0.1×	21 0.5×	13	375
Milla Kallio	17 0.1×	168 1.1×	26 0.2×	50 1.0×	10 0.2×	10	350
Amier Ahmad	49 0.3×	51 0.3×	73 0.6×	43 0.9×	1 0.0×	19	305
Fiona Reid	38 0.2×	81 0.5×	5 0.0×	63 1.3×	53 1.3×	12	295
Somkiat Potisat	48 0.3×	34 0.2×	28 0.2×	4 0.1×	59 1.4×	11	389
Stephanie Payne	49 0.3×	65 0.4×	47 0.4×	8 0.2×	1 0.0×	15	318
Nisha Agrawal	27 0.2×	27 0.2×	184 1.4×	7 0.1×	18 0.4×	16	334
Sherrie Harris	107 0.7×	142 0.9×	86 0.7×		102 2.5×	13	378
Atsushi Sakamoto	156 1.0×	3 0.0×	181 1.4×	18 0.4×	12 0.3×	17	354
H. Cohen	20 0.1×	109 0.7×	21 0.2×	4 0.1×	32 0.8×	13	374

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Russell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Russell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Russell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Russell. The network helps show where Dana Russell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Russell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Russell. Dana Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact