Dana Maude

731 total citations
12 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

Dana Maude is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana Maude has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Dana Maude's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers). Dana Maude is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers). Dana Maude collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Dana Maude's co-authors include Jane Edwards, Patrick D. McGorry, John Cocks, Henry J. Jackson, Susy Harrigan, Eleanor H. Wertheim, Kay Gibbons, Susan J. Paxton, George Szmukler and Carol Hulbert and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Schizophrenia Research.

In The Last Decade

Dana Maude

12 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Dana Maude

PMH

CP

PHILO

ECP

SP

Mary P. O’Brien United States

Joan W. Ellason United States

Steven Leicester Australia

Jean Luc Venisse France

Katarzyna Sitko United Kingdom

Michael Bourke Canada

Paulo de Tarso Xavier Sousa Brazil

A. Hussain Tuma United States

Michael B. First United States

Warren Larkin United Kingdom

Mary P. O’Brien United States

Dana Maude

625 ×1.5

PMH

475 ×1.4

CP

146 ×0.6

PHILO

96 ×1.2

ECP

111 ×1.6

SP

Citations per year, relative to Dana Maude Dana Maude (= 1×) peers Mary P. O’Brien

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Maude

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Maude's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Maude with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Maude more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Maude

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Maude. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Maude. The network helps show where Dana Maude may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Maude

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Maude. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Maude based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Maude. Dana Maude is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Jackson, Henry J., Patrick D. McGorry, Jane Edwards, et al.. (2005). A controlled trial of cognitively oriented psychotherapy for early psychosis (COPE) with four-year follow-up readmission data. Psychological Medicine. 35(9). 1295–1306. 49 indexed citations

2.

Maude, Dana, et al.. (2002). Systematic Treatment of Persistent Psychosis (STOPP). 3 indexed citations

3.

Maude, Dana, et al.. (2002). Systematic Treatment of Persistent Psychosis (STOPP). 4 indexed citations

4.

Edwards, Jane, Dana Maude, Lisa Wong, et al.. (2002). Rehab Rounds: A Service Response to Prolonged Recovery in Early Psychosis. Psychiatric Services. 53(9). 1067–1069. 36 indexed citations

5.

Maude, Dana, et al.. (2002). Systematic treatment of persistent psychosis (STOPP) : a psychological approach to facilitating recovery in young people with first episode psychosis. 22 indexed citations

6.

Jackson, Henry J., Patrick D. McGorry, Lisa Henry, et al.. (2001). Cognitively oriented psychotherapy for early psychosis (COPE): A 1‐year follow‐up. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 40(1). 57–70. 63 indexed citations

7.

Krstev, Helen, Henry J. Jackson, & Dana Maude. (1999). An investigation of attributional style in first‐episode psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38(2). 181–194. 58 indexed citations

8.

Edwards, Jane, Dana Maude, Patrick D. McGorry, Susy Harrigan, & John Cocks. (1998). Prolonged recovery in first-episode psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 172(S33). 107–116. 92 indexed citations

9.

Jackson, Henry J., Patrick D. McGorry, Jane Edwards, et al.. (1998). Cognitively-oriented psychotherapy for early psychosis (COPE): Preliminary results. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 172(S33). 93–100. 105 indexed citations

10.

McGorry, Patrick D., Henry J. Jackson, Jane Edwards, et al.. (1997). Cognitively-oriented psychotherapy for early psychosis (COPE): Preliminary results. Schizophrenia Research. 24(1-2). 226–226. 6 indexed citations

11.

Maude, Dana, Eleanor H. Wertheim, Susan J. Paxton, Kay Gibbons, & George Szmukler. (1993). Body dissatisfaction, weight loss behaviours, and bulimic tendencies in Australian adolescents with an estimate of female data representativeness. Australian Psychologist. 28(2). 128–132. 32 indexed citations

12.

Wertheim, Eleanor H., Susan J. Paxton, Dana Maude, et al.. (1992). Psychosocial predictors of weight loss behaviors and binge eating in adolescent girls and boys. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 12(2). 151–160. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact