Dana Lazar
About
In The Last Decade
Dana Lazar
8 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 453
- Surgery 363
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 297
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 55
- Epidemiology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Lazar
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Lazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Lazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Lazar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Lazar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Lazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Lazar. The network helps show where Dana Lazar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Lazar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Lazar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Lazar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Lazar. Dana Lazar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 203 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 198 | |
| 8 | 104 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.