Dana Jenkins
About
In The Last Decade
Dana Jenkins
6 papers receiving 141 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Biomedical Engineering 51
- Biomaterials 39
- Surgery 27
- Immunology and Allergy 21
- Epidemiology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Jenkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Jenkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Jenkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Jenkins. The network helps show where Dana Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Jenkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Jenkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Jenkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Jenkins. Dana Jenkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Improving operating room efficiency: A sisyphean task? | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.