Dana Eldreth

3.3k citations
23 papers · 2.6k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Dana Eldreth

20 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Dana Eldreth
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Pharmacology 846
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 631
  • General Decision Sciences 69
Replace Valentina Lorenzetti with:
Valentina Lorenzetti Australia
Janna Cousijn Netherlands
Jodi M. Gilman United States
Ruth Salo United States
Liam J. Nestor United Kingdom
Kelly E. Courtney United States
Natania A. Crane United States
Alecia D. Schweinsburg United States
Judy Rubinsztein United Kingdom
María José Fernández-Serrano Spain
Dana Eldreth relative to Valentina Lorenzetti Australia Valentina Lorenzetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Valentina Lorenzetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Eldreth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Eldreth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Eldreth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Eldreth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Eldreth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Eldreth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Eldreth. The network helps show where Dana Eldreth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Eldreth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Eldreth Line = papers co-authored together Dana Eldreth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002479
2 2003444
3 2005291
4 2003214
5 2004211
6 2004210
7 2003203
8 2004196
9 201186
10 200765
11 200952
12 201345
13 201042
14 201525
15 201321
16 200615
17 20016
18 20114
19 20233
20 20251

About Dana Eldreth

Dana Eldreth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Pharmacology (846 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (631 citations) and General Decision Sciences (69 citations). Dana Eldreth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen I. Bolla, John A. Matochik, Jean Lud Cadet, Edythe D. London, Kyle Brown, Jean-Lud Cadet, Alane S. Kimes, Carlo Contoreggi, Varughese Kurian and Kent A. Kiehl. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Cortex, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Aging & Mental Health and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact