Dan Zong
About
In The Last Decade
Dan Zong
59 papers receiving 648 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 453
- Cancer Research 214
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 109
- Oncology 109
- Plant Science 92
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Zong
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Zong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Zong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Zong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Zong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Zong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Zong. The network helps show where Dan Zong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Zong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Zong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Zong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Zong. Dan Zong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.