Dan Wen
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Topics
- Corneal surgery and disorders (21 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Dan Wen
82 papers receiving 865 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 291
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 212
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 199
- Epidemiology 181
- Ophthalmology 168
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Wen
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Wen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Wen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Wen. The network helps show where Dan Wen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Wen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Wen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Wen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Wen. Dan Wen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Diagnostic performance of corneal microlayer tomography in the diagnosis of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy | 3 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Validation Study for Corneal Microlayer Tomography Automatic Segmentation Algorithm | 1 |
| 18 | Three-Dimensional Bowmans Microlayer Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Subclinical Keratoconus | 5 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Dan Wen
Dan Wen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Aging, having authored 87 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (21 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (168 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (212 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (291 citations). Dan Wen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Xin Du, Xianliang Zhou, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma, Rutai Hui, Changsheng Ma, Jian‐Jun Li, Weitao Song, Xiaobo Xia and Xiaoying Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.