Dan Priel

440 total citations
54 papers, 140 citations indexed

About

Dan Priel is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Priel has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 140 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Law, 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Dan Priel's work include Legal principles and applications (23 papers), Law in Society and Culture (18 papers) and Free Will and Agency (15 papers). Dan Priel is often cited by papers focused on Legal principles and applications (23 papers), Law in Society and Culture (18 papers) and Free Will and Agency (15 papers). Dan Priel collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Dan Priel's co-authors include David Luban and has published in prestigious journals such as Law & Society Review, Journal of Law and Society and The American Journal of Comparative Law.

In The Last Decade

Dan Priel

38 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dan Priel Canada 8 95 51 39 35 22 54 140
Alec D. Walen United States 6 29 0.3× 27 0.5× 43 1.1× 45 1.3× 19 0.9× 37 96
Sarah Summers Switzerland 4 120 1.3× 96 1.9× 5 0.1× 12 0.3× 14 0.6× 11 184
Patrick Tomlin United Kingdom 8 21 0.2× 79 1.5× 52 1.3× 44 1.3× 18 0.8× 16 130
Matt Matravers United Kingdom 7 16 0.2× 72 1.4× 51 1.3× 49 1.4× 12 0.5× 27 140
Josep Joan Moreso Spain 7 128 1.3× 134 2.6× 23 0.6× 12 0.3× 5 0.2× 80 182
Betsy Byrd Germany 5 17 0.2× 104 2.0× 125 3.2× 43 1.2× 12 0.5× 14 177
Mark R. Reiff United States 7 8 0.1× 36 0.7× 24 0.6× 28 0.8× 18 0.8× 20 90
Michael Silverthorne Canada 4 16 0.2× 66 1.3× 49 1.3× 9 0.3× 19 0.9× 7 120
James E. Crimmins Canada 8 11 0.1× 74 1.5× 44 1.1× 12 0.3× 13 0.6× 31 132
Hans Welzel Germany 4 38 0.4× 31 0.6× 12 0.3× 13 0.4× 7 0.3× 21 88

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Priel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Priel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Priel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Priel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Priel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Priel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Priel. The network helps show where Dan Priel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Priel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Priel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Priel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Priel. Dan Priel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Priel, Dan. (2023). Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action. Law and Philosophy. 43(1). 31–59.
2.
Priel, Dan. (2021). COVID-19: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Politics. Osgoode Hall law journal. 57(3). 537–565. 1 indexed citations
3.
Priel, Dan. (2021). Bentham’s Public Utilitarianism and Its Jurisprudential Significance. Ratio Juris. 34(4). 415–437. 1 indexed citations
4.
Priel, Dan. (2020). 'That is Not How the Common Law Works': Paths to Tort Liability for Harassment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 52(1). 87. 1 indexed citations
5.
Priel, Dan. (2020). Law Is What the Judge Had for Breakfast: A Brief History of an Unpalatable Idea. Buffalo law review. 68(3). 899. 3 indexed citations
6.
Priel, Dan. (2019). Evidence-Based Jurisprudence: An Essay for Oxford. SSRN Electronic Journal. 19(2). 87–115. 2 indexed citations
7.
Priel, Dan. (2017). The Possibility of Naturalistic Jurisprudence: Legal Positivism and Natural Law Theory Revisited. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
8.
Priel, Dan. (2017). Criminalization, Legitimacy, and Welfare. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 12(4). 657–676. 2 indexed citations
9.
Priel, Dan, et al.. (2015). Jurisprudence and (Its) History. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
10.
Priel, Dan. (2014). Jurisprudential Disagreements and Descriptivism. 1(8). 1 indexed citations
11.
Priel, Dan. (2012). Are Jurisprudential Debates Conceptual?: Some Lessons from Democratic Theory. Osgoode Hall law journal. 50(2). 359–402. 2 indexed citations
12.
Priel, Dan. (2012). Jurisprudence Between Science and the Humanities. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 4(2). 269–323. 2 indexed citations
13.
Luban, David, et al.. (2011). Risk Taking and Force Protection. SSRN Electronic Journal. 287–311. 13 indexed citations
14.
Priel, Dan. (2011). Torts, Rights, and Right-Wing Ideology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
15.
Priel, Dan. (2011). That Can't Be Rights. Jurisprudence. 2(1). 227–238.
16.
Priel, Dan. (2010). Description and Evaluation in Jurisprudence. Law and Philosophy. 29(6). 633–667. 1 indexed citations
17.
Priel, Dan. (2008). The Boundaries of Law and the Purpose of Legal Philosophy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
18.
Priel, Dan. (2008). Sanction and Obligation in Hart's Theory of Law. Ratio Juris. 21(3). 404–411. 8 indexed citations
19.
Priel, Dan. (2006). TROUBLE FOR LEGAL POSITIVISM. Legal Theory. 12(3). 225–263. 7 indexed citations
20.
Priel, Dan. (2005). Farewell to the Exclusive-Inclusive Debate. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 25(4). 675–696. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026