Dan Neely

58 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Dan Neely
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 110
  • Cell Biology 129
  • Ophthalmology 56
  • Plant Science 210
  • Endocrinology 26
Replace K. V. Sankaran with:
K. V. Sankaran India
D. W. French United States
J. Zwoliñski South Africa
C. E. Cordell United States
D. B. Redfern United Kingdom
Jonalea R. Tonn United States
Willis R. Littke United States
Clyde L. Elmore United States
Rafael Sánchez‐Cuesta Spain
Lars-Göran Stener Sweden
Dan Neely relative to K. V. Sankaran India K. V. Sankaran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
K. V. Sankaran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Neely

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Neely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Neely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Neely more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Neely

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Neely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Neely. The network helps show where Dan Neely may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Dan Neely, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Neely Line = papers co-authored together Dan Neely links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197032
2 201331
3
TREE WOUND CLOSURE
198724
4 198822
5 197019
6 197918
7 196917
8 201615
9 198314
10 196513
11 197312
12 196611
13
The histology and histochemistry of the wound healing process in geranium pelargonium hortorum cultivar yours truly cuttings
198311
14 199110
15
Temperature and Sycamore anthracnose severity.
19639
16 20169
17 19909
18 19769
19 19939
20 19819

About Dan Neely

Dan Neely is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Endocrinology, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (26 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (16 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (12 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (10 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (5 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (110 citations), Cell Biology (129 citations), Ophthalmology (56 citations), Plant Science (210 citations) and Endocrinology (26 citations). Dan Neely has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. M. Black, Erick D. Bothun, Scott R. Lambert, Stacey J. Kruger, Stephen P. Christiansen, Deborah K. VanderVeen, Michael Lynn, C.H. Beckman, Julia Cleveland and Gary P. Munkvold. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Phytopathology, HortScience and Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026